Like Tree0Likes

Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?

Reply
Old 07-10-2003, 08:47 PM
  #1
Byron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?

Just asking what everone thinks about these two drives. I've picked the Arneson setup on my new Spectre 36' over the Pulse. The pulse looked to bulky and add on. I thought the Arneson was a cleaner look and a more experienced company. Just wondering your thoughts.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2003, 10:43 AM
  #2
1975 X-18 Donzi, Arneson
Platinum Member
 
GEOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: CT
My Boats: Boating, scuba, fishing
Posts: 151
Default

Arneson, proven, been around a long time, larger network world wide dealers & suppliers, easy to get parts. Many sizes and custom parts available.
GEOO is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2003, 12:04 PM
  #3
Charter Member#350
Charter Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 378
Default

Remember that my Pulse Drive looks "bulky" because it is a double shaft/propeller system. In your case it is going to be a single system on each side.
If your engine hatch opens to the sides (split engine hatch) you can actually step into the Pulse Drive to look and work on the rear section of your engines.
The swim platform and the rudder of the Pulse Drive will protect your propeller if you go to shallow or if you hit a marina wall going in reverse.
Catmando is right on his comments and the last reason is (look at photo)
Attached Thumbnails
Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?-imongo.jpg  
Zero Cavity is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2003, 12:26 PM
  #4
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Posts: 1,658
Default

The pulse looks to be a simple, straitforward design. Anyone in boating has to like that.
My only concern id the tranny. The arneson transfers trust to the transom. The pulse puts the trust on the tranny. These tranny were made to handle that, so that's not the problem.
My question relates to the trimming mechanism design. The pulse looks like it puts the Ujoint on the tranny output flange. This will result in some off center thrust being transferred to the tranny. Most IB tranny are only designed for thrust parallel to the output shaft. For those who have worked in IB boats, prop shaft misallignment results in a similar situation. The result of that is premature output bearing and seal failure in the tranny.
I would just check with the tranny manufacturer would reccomend this type of installation.
My $0.02
Gary
Gary Anderson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2003, 01:08 PM
  #5
Registered
 
dreamboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southern Maryland
My Boats: 2000 28 Skater
Posts: 1,234
Default

Are these drives priced similar to each other? How do they compare in price to #6?
dreamboater is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2003, 02:00 PM
  #6
Registered
 
GregP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Annapolis MD
My Boats: 1989 Scorpion 32 CC
Posts: 1,464
Default

They are both essentially FREE if your comparing to a #6 drive

-Greg
GregP is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2003, 02:10 PM
  #7
Charter Mod
Charter Member
 
BLee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: E Dock
My Boats: Cigarette - "90MPH" Edition
Posts: 6,551
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GregP
They are both essentially FREE if your comparing to a #6 drive

-Greg
LOL They can also handle more power than a 6.
BLee is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2003, 05:22 PM
  #8
PULSEDRIVE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gary

The problem with a misaligned IB drive shaft is the vibration not the off center trust, running through a single Ujoint minimizes vibration, saving the bearings and seals on the tranny.

99% of all our applications are run with ZF trannys, Hi HP applications we have Huber up grades done to the ZFs
All come with full warranty

Pulse Drive makes 23 different drives.
Drives come in singles, twins, triples and quads.

Parts are carried in 32 different countries and adding everyday

our engineering team have been working with surface drives since the '60

If anyone has any questions feel free to contact me directly

Tony

954 788 0810
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2003, 05:38 PM
  #9
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Steve 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beautiful Fort Lauderdale www.cheetahcat.com
My Boats: Slippery when wet!
Posts: 10,833
Default

Another point is the Horsepower Loss on a # 6 what would be the prop-shaft Horse-power of say a 600 HP engine

560-550 ? thats a big price to pay ..also on those toy bravos that need the water cooling whats that all about?? LOL Oh do you know heat generated by friction is the most costly..That BTW in terms of required energy input.
Steve 1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2003, 06:01 PM
  #10
Registered
 
KNOT-RIGHT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Providence,RI
My Boats: Turbine 46 Skater
Posts: 3,172
Default

I Have had excellent luck with Arnesons

There proven and durable!!

Just my 2 cents


How ya like these eggbeaters!!
Attached Thumbnails
Pulse Drive vs Arneson ?-dscn0182.jpg  
KNOT-RIGHT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baja27
General Boating Discussion
15
01-08-2007 10:21 PM
375stinger
General Q & A
11
01-10-2005 06:24 AM
Zero Cavity
General Boating Discussion
40
07-23-2003 04:33 PM
Jassman
General Boating Discussion
30
07-05-2003 04:11 PM
imongo
General Q & A
1
11-02-2002 08:34 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.