Russian MiG-25 Foxbat....was found buried?
#12
speel chekk this fokker!
Charter Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Locust Valley, New York
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
kinda silly how they burrie dit. I figiured maybe they woudl biuld some kind of bunker underground or at elast some kinda of structure to keep from dumpign sand directly on it.....
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
#15
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
yeah, don't knock the soviet airframes.
Made tough to take off and land in pastures.
Aerodynamically more stable and able to sustain higher g-loadings than our planes - ours have computers to correct their unstable designs while theirs still turn and maneuver while remaining stable.
Dogfighting days are over, but our planes electronically limit g-forces. Theirs can momentarily pull way more than where our limits are set.
As was mentioned, air show footage will show somepretty incredible things fro the soviet planes.
The Foxbat, from what I remember, was a motor-eater. While the blackbird's hybrid turbo-ramjets had a long service life at insane cruising speeds, the Foxbat motors had ONE HARD RUN in them before they were toast. High speed cruise, yes, but full military power? Ate em up.
Course this is just drivel from post cold war reading. I ain't never driven one.
Made tough to take off and land in pastures.
Aerodynamically more stable and able to sustain higher g-loadings than our planes - ours have computers to correct their unstable designs while theirs still turn and maneuver while remaining stable.
Dogfighting days are over, but our planes electronically limit g-forces. Theirs can momentarily pull way more than where our limits are set.
As was mentioned, air show footage will show somepretty incredible things fro the soviet planes.
The Foxbat, from what I remember, was a motor-eater. While the blackbird's hybrid turbo-ramjets had a long service life at insane cruising speeds, the Foxbat motors had ONE HARD RUN in them before they were toast. High speed cruise, yes, but full military power? Ate em up.
Course this is just drivel from post cold war reading. I ain't never driven one.
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
That plane is a high speed flying tank, it's built of nickel steel and has supersonic G-loading that our stuff doesn't match. As far as it eating engines, that was because the turbines started to act like a ram jet and the air flow not fuel flow regulated their speed and could easily hit 120% even still a good pilot could control that to an extent. Even with that draw back it fly's at Mach 2.8 sustained, easily outrunning what we had to offer, and it was clocked at Mach 3.2 by the Isralies evading an F-4. It may be old but that bugger is still impressive.