View Poll Results: Should I go..
Supercharger
31
50.82%
Turbocharger
13
21.31%
Big Inch NA
17
27.87%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Like Tree0Likes

Supercharge or Turbocharge

Reply
Old 02-04-2004, 07:37 PM
  #21
GLH
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
GLH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Burlington, VT
My Boats: Azimut
Posts: 15,267
Default

If you ever want to sell your boat one day;
1. Big Cubes NA
2. Blower

If you want to keep it till you die of old age;
Turbo
GLH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 07:40 PM
  #22
Registered
 
LapseofReason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stafford Va.
My Boats: 98 NORTECH 5000V
Posts: 2,806
Default

I think you should just put nice stock power under the hatch and bolt a JATO rocket on top that way you can have the best of both worlds, turn key reliability and speed at the touch of a button.
LapseofReason is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 07:45 PM
  #23
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
CAP071's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 16,430
Default

Here I heard this baby rocks!
Attached Thumbnails
Supercharge or Turbocharge-barbie%25202.jpg  
CAP071 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 08:00 PM
  #24
Registered
 
Reed Jensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 8,301
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GLH
If you ever want to sell your boat one day;
1. Big Cubes NA
2. Blower

If you want to keep it till you die of old age;
Turbo
yeap! I agree!
Reed Jensen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 08:44 PM
  #25
Charter Member #655
Charter Member
 
dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland, Michigan
My Boats: 1993 Sonic 31ss
Posts: 4,939
Default

Where is Tom Earhart???He is the King of marine turbo he rocks!!!!last I heard 1400+ hp one bad a$$ ride!!!
__________________
If your boat has a sail do you ride a horse to the ramp?
dyno is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 09:26 PM
  #26
Registered
Thread Starter
 
robyw1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Spring, TX
My Boats: 1998 Wellcraft 22' Scarab
Posts: 2,759
Default

Ok first as far as intercooling in a marine environment I would never consider an air-to-air system. This would be dumb because you are sitting on a world of cool water just outside the boat. Water cools 25 times more efficiently than air. Why wouldn't you go with a water-to-air IC setup like the GMC Syclones & Typhoons? One concern I have about blowers is that they have a short life before they need to be refreshed. Now correct me if I'm wrong about that because my SC experience is lacking. Turbo lag can be minimized by using 2 ball bearing S-trim (or H-trim) turbo with the proper A/R ratio. BOVs can also be used to eliminate compressor surge when the throttle is dropped. In the past I have developed a way to isolate the heat from the turbine side and the compressor side without the use of the fire prone thermowrap. (I know I lost my GMC Syclone #811 to a thermowrap fire) I just think that if I can find the correct water jacketed manifolds I think I can get this to work successfully. I really want to keep my engine hatch looking stock too which pretty much means a roots type blower is out. I feel comfortable building a turbocharged engine because of my experience. I have put together a 2835cc Toyota inline 6 that makes well in excess of 850 HP and it gets driven almost daily. I had to go as far as to manufacture my own fuel rail system to fit with the newer T51 turbo. I have no doubt I can make big horsepower this way and have NO downtime if I can get the exhaust plumbing straightened out.

Thanks for all the great replies.
Roby
robyw1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 09:33 PM
  #27
Registered
 
Turbojack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Houston, TX, USA
My Boats: 2003 Eliminator 30' Daytona
Posts: 2,285
Default

I have had turbo power for the last 25+ years. With waste gates you do not have to worry about lag. At least I did not have any. From off idle if you hammered the throttle it was instant max. boost. I had dial on dash where I could change from min. 4.5 lbs to max of 17. The setup I had (gale banks) the exhaust manifolds were limiting my max HP. The main problem I had was it was too easy to crank more boost into the engine. Richard Lee makes an awesome setup for turbos. I have 2 friends that have his setup.

I went the pro-charger & Cami header route 3 years ago & have not looked back. Motor is running 10lbs now & holding up better that before (harder to increase the max boost now) with more HP then I had before with turbos @ same boost.
Turbojack is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 10:10 PM
  #28
VIP Member
Trade Score: (1)
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Hawthorn Woods IL
My Boats: 2000 Baja 36 Outlaw
Posts: 4,186
Default

Supercharge it for the water.

Turbo for the street.

Who said a supercharger has a short life span. I run a whipplecharger and it will alst a long time. It is based on the Eaton design which is the same one used by most car mfgs and the car will go 100k+.

Keep and eye out for a used whipple setup on ebay. It will also have an air to water intercooler that is extremely efficient.

BOOST BABY !!!!
__________________
Want your ECU tuned right?? Call Mark at Precision www.pmefi.com
Smitty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 10:15 PM
  #29
Charter Member #927
Charter Member
 
Payton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
My Boats: 1991 34' Super Hawaii
Posts: 4,817
Default

I used to have a twin turboed engine. It ran great! It was an olderstyle turbo system with a blowoff vavle on the carb box. boost would start to build at about 2800rpms. When getting on plane, the engine only had to build a few hundred rpms when the boost would start to come on. Then I had to back out of the throttle to keep from breaking the prop loose.
It had log style manifolds and water jacketed turbos.

I've often wondered if a turbo could be adapted to a Gil style manifild. Seems like it would be a natural fit.
Payton is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 12:01 AM
  #30
Registered
 
Reed Jensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 8,301
Default

I agree with Troutly.... Rootes type superchargers will go many more hours than the engines themselves. Most of the time turbos will be seizing and coking their center sections a lot faster than a supercharger will be wearing out it's seals and bearings. A supercharger with worn seal strips will still pump and work to a certain degree.... the strips can only wear so much... but once a turbo is seized....or the bearings are gone... it is dead matter in the path of the exhaust... talk about stuffed up performance!
Reed Jensen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ridin-Dirty
General Q & A
19
09-18-2008 06:30 PM
brian valery
Formula
6
08-01-2006 11:28 AM
GREEK LIGHTNING
General Boating Discussion
27
06-19-2004 03:36 PM
two-air
General Q & A
26
05-19-2002 12:17 PM
outlawinil
General Q & A
5
01-12-2002 05:22 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.