Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Pro Max 300's, good or bad?? >

Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

Notices

Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-09-2004, 04:00 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,962
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

Had a pair of X's with regular lowers instead of sportmasters. Sportmasters were more maintenance from what I saw at the drive shops in Miami. Never had any problems other than you need to make sure the plugs are gapped correctly or they like to stall at idle. I would not touch a pair of non X's based on friends experiences.
OffshoreOnly is offline  
Old 07-09-2004, 04:01 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tampa,Fl.
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

Yeah, But remember those lowers are where all the power is delivered to the prop and those constantley leaving and coming back into the water are going to shorten the life of those gears.
Donzi Corleone is offline  
Old 07-10-2004, 10:32 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

These motors do have sportmaster lowers. Would the 2002 300's be 300X?
tomcat3 is offline  
Old 07-10-2004, 10:46 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
frequentflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

Yep. '02s are 300Xs.
frequentflyer is offline  
Old 07-10-2004, 10:52 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Tantrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: USR, NJ
Posts: 4,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

Im looking at a boat w/ '00 Pro Max Sportmaster lowers.
What are the opinions on this specific set-up.....good,bad?
Tantrum is offline  
Old 07-10-2004, 11:56 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Hydro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

1999 pro max 380 hours.

Twin 2002 300 X's with 254 hours and still going.
I had a problem with the alternators, now they run very strong.

At $18,500 a motor you can not beat the bang for the buck. If you consider a pair of 525 EFI's and speed master six's would cost $100,000.
Also fuel consumption is 28- 32 gallons per motor @ 85-92 MPH cruise, on a 32 Skater.
Hydro is offline  
Old 07-10-2004, 02:05 PM
  #17  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
timewarp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Silverdale,Washington,USA
Posts: 602
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??

I have a pair of 2001 300X's, the first year for the X's there were many improvements to the 2002 motors in the electronics, they should be good motors for your friend. Also for the shiftshaft seal problem Lakeland Marine in Lake Havasu has a new Billet shift shaft seal holder that holds 2 seals, the best solution to the problem I've seen. http://www.mercspeed.com/new.html
timewarp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teamsutphen
General Boating Discussion
7
05-17-2020 12:33 AM
Hollywood300
Spectre
5
08-22-2007 05:23 PM
Wettin My Shorts
General Q & A
2
01-16-2006 05:54 PM
rvrtricks
General Boating Discussion
2
08-30-2005 06:01 AM
Top Banana
General Boating Discussion
8
03-19-2005 08:56 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Pro Max 300's, good or bad??


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.