which is a better motor, 750 NA Sterling or 750 NA Richie Zul. Personally, from looks i like the looks of the Zuls, but looks
doesn't always matter. those of you who have maybe had
both, Which One????

both are great engines. no lose in either case.... this will be very tough to compare the two, both are great. stecz..

Look at the price of the Sterlings and the Zul's. I would go with the zul's and save the extra money you saved for a future rebuild.

We run a Zul blower motor. We are very happy with it. Richie's tech. support has been great. Any questions he will always speak to you. A great guy to deal with.
Tom

sterling but better tyler crockets but those 2 are really up there in money but i would have to agree with apache 21 go with the zul's and save the extra money you saved for a future rebuild

donz jr mike

I've owned Sterling's from 750hp "B class" engines to 1100hp Blowers, good stuff but Zul's got the best package in the 600hp -750hp na range. To be fair, Sterling's best efforts are the big hp blower motors, if you plan to really use the power, not just "have" the power (and they really do build the #'s as advertised) it's Mike and maybe now Merc. but both are DAMNED EXPENSIVE !