New JC Performance motor on dyno
03-10-2005 | 11:27 PM
#31
Registered
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: MO
Re: New JC Performance motor on dyno
JC's video-----------------Hell I'm still waiting on TMP's video.
It must take a lot of time to convert it.
I have a feeling they won't have that for a while, the sad part is they brought the video up...............................
It must take a lot of time to convert it.
I have a feeling they won't have that for a while, the sad part is they brought the video up...............................
03-11-2005 | 09:46 AM
#32
Registered
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 9
From: Long Island,New York
Re: New JC Performance motor on dyno
Originally Posted by NOBODY
JC's video-----------------Hell I'm still waiting on TMP's video.
It must take a lot of time to convert it.
I have a feeling they won't have that for a while, the sad part is they brought the video up...............................
It must take a lot of time to convert it.
I have a feeling they won't have that for a while, the sad part is they brought the video up...............................
03-11-2005 | 10:37 AM
#36
Registered
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 9
From: Long Island,New York
Re: New JC Performance motor on dyno
Originally Posted by RumRunner
Correct, it won't affect the C.F., but it will affect the HP.
03-11-2005 | 11:19 AM
#39
Registered
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
From: Slidell,La
Re: New JC Performance motor on dyno
Originally Posted by Stormrider
Dyno sheet for all the doubters...
at 5800 is not bad but 1050 at 5800 would be more usable in a boat.
03-11-2005 | 11:42 AM
#40
Registered
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,908
Likes: 9
From: Long Island,New York
Re: New JC Performance motor on dyno
Originally Posted by vette131
is this motor going in a drag car?? if it's going in a boat i hope they have some small props to get to peak hp. aprox 970hp
at 5800 is not bad but 1050 at 5800 would be more usable in a boat.
at 5800 is not bad but 1050 at 5800 would be more usable in a boat.
