Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   Marine Lubrication (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/107808-marine-lubrication.html)

Rage 11-24-2006 07:39 AM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 

Originally Posted by Hydrocruiser
Over time that is usually the case.

I guess this is a little less than the ringing endorsement that I was looking for. Given that the engine oil change history for my stock 496 was 1.) repalced the orginal factory oil and filter at about 10 hours with engine hot (boat delivered in Fall), 2.) replaced the oil and filter again at 90 hours after relatively mild usage with hot engine I have trouble imagining a huge reservoir of engine wear debris left over from an engine total of 90 hours of use with Merc 25W40 still waiting to contaminate future oil changes of Mobil 1 20W50. But maybe I am truely that ignorant.

Is there any true A vs B comparison engine wear debris test data that compares Mobil 1 20W50 versus Merc 25W40 engine oil?

Hydrocruiser 11-25-2006 02:20 PM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 
[QUOTE=Rage]I guess this is a little less than the ringing endorsement that I was looking for. Given that the engine oil change history for my stock 496 was 1.) replaced the original factory oil and filter at about 10 hours with engine hot (boat delivered in Fall), 2.) replaced the oil and filter again at 90 hours after relatively mild usage with hot engine I have trouble imagining a huge reservoir of engine wear debris left over from an engine total of 90 hours of use with Merc 25W40 still waiting to contaminate future oil changes of Mobil 1 20W50. But maybe I am truly that ignorant.

Is there any true A vs B comparison engine wear debris test data that compares Mobil 1 20W50 versus Merc 25W40 engine oil?[/QUOTE]

I understand what you are asking for and the reason I can not give you a definitive answer is because this is specific to your engine I believe.

Nobody has been able to help me despite several calls to better understand and help answer your questions better. You have a very good question and I hope we can find an answer.

I am being told you should repeat an oil sample to get additional data because one sample does not constitute a study. One needs several samples to see a trend.

Hope that helps.

Jamie Bowman 11-26-2006 10:10 AM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 
NEED YOUR HELP FAST!! it is 67 degrees outside and just put M1 V-twin in a 2003 chevy truck w/ the 496 motor. I am not an experienced valve guy, but it sounds like the valves are floating and rattling at start up, after it is warm and you give it gas, sounds like floating, after floating goes away, let off gas and sounds like floating again on idiling down. this happens with or without a load. AM i ABOUT TO DESTROY THE TOP END OR DAMAGE IT? SHOULD I DRAIN THAT OIL AND GO BACK TO M-1 EP 5W-30 AS PER MANUFACTURE?

Hydrocruiser 11-26-2006 05:19 PM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 

Originally Posted by Jamie Bowman
NEED YOUR HELP FAST!! it is 67 degrees outside and just put M1 V-twin in a 2003 chevy truck w/ the 496 motor. I am not an experienced valve guy, but it sounds like the valves are floating and rattling at start up, after it is warm and you give it gas, sounds like floating, after floating goes away, let off gas and sounds like floating again on idiling down. this happens with or without a load. AM i ABOUT TO DESTROY THE TOP END OR DAMAGE IT? SHOULD I DRAIN THAT OIL AND GO BACK TO M-1 EP 5W-30 AS PER MANUFACTURE?



Going from 5w-30 to 20w-50 is a steep climb.

More than I would be comfortable doing.

Jamie Bowman 11-26-2006 08:51 PM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 
drained it moments later! can I mix M1 5W 30 EP w/ any of the 20W 50 V twin I drained? & if so what ratio in st pete area for winter & summer? in winter we are rarely below 40 degrees & can wait until it is 50 or above. summer high 95 low 80. earlier posts may have answer but appreciate new info for myself & others I have reading this thank you

Rage 11-26-2006 09:31 PM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 
[QUOTE=Hydrocruiser]

Originally Posted by Rage
I guess this is a little less than the ringing endorsement that I was looking for. Given that the engine oil change history for my stock 496 was 1.) replaced the original factory oil and filter at about 10 hours with engine hot (boat delivered in Fall), 2.) replaced the oil and filter again at 90 hours after relatively mild usage with hot engine I have trouble imagining a huge reservoir of engine wear debris left over from an engine total of 90 hours of use with Merc 25W40 still waiting to contaminate future oil changes of Mobil 1 20W50. But maybe I am truly that ignorant.

Is there any true A vs B comparison engine wear debris test data that compares Mobil 1 20W50 versus Merc 25W40 engine oil?[/QUOTE]

I understand what you are asking for and the reason I can not give you a definitive answer is because this is specific to your engine I believe.

Nobody has been able to help me despite several calls to better understand and help answer your questions better. You have a very good question and I hope we can find an answer.

I am being told you should repeat an oil sample to get additional data because one sample does not constitute a study. One needs several samples to see a trend.

Hope that helps.

Thank you for your conscientious effort and comment. Much appreciated.

I must say you are starting to make me a little nervious with your " this is specific to your engine I believe " comment. Would your expand further on this?

Re the suggestion to repeat an oil sample for additional data, when is that additional oil sample to be taken? Now? After another season? Other?

Finally the most important question, is there any possible secenario where the Mobil 1 20W50 V Twin oil could be the cause of actual increased engine wear in a 496 engine versus the Merc 25W40 oil for which the engine is designed?

Thanks

Hydrocruiser 11-27-2006 07:26 AM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 

Originally Posted by Rage
Thank you for your conscientious effort and comment. Much appreciated.

I must say you are starting to make me a little nervous with your " this is specific to your engine I believe " comment. Would your expand further on this?

Re the suggestion to repeat an oil sample for additional data, when is that additional oil sample to be taken? Now? After another season? Other?

Finally the most important question, is there any possible scenario where the Mobil 1 20W50 V Twin oil could be the cause of actual increased engine wear in a 496 engine versus the Merc 25W40 oil for which the engine is designed?

Thanks

Going from a 25W-40 to a 20W-50 is not a big climb.


Many race teams use 20W-50 synthetics in their 496/502 engines. It sets a prescient.

berns29scarab 11-27-2006 07:52 AM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 
dont mean to hijack your thread but quick question...have you ever used engine restore in a marine application ? have used it in a few high mileage cars with good results ?

Rage 11-27-2006 07:53 AM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 
Re the suggestion to repeat an oil sample for additional data, when is that additional oil sample to be taken? Now? After another season? Other?

minxguy 11-27-2006 12:17 PM

Re: Marine Lubrication
 

Originally Posted by Rage
Yes. If I am hearing right, it is a synthetic if it comes from a chemically modified oil regardless if it is a modification of a petroleum oil, animal/vegtable oil, coal, liquified natural gas, PAO's, ester based, etc. Conversely then defining what a 'conventional' petroleum oil seems to become more difficult since are not they also modifications of some base oil by addition of various additives to control viscosity, corrosion, as well as additions of dispersants, detergents, etc. Can you define how they differ?

Rage, we are talking base oils here ...not finished lubes, which have the additions of various additives. A Group III base stock is a highly refined petroleum stock. The refiners just remove more of the impurities from the petroleum basestock. This extra refining brings the Group III base stock closer to synththetics in some ways, but not the way the base stock was created.

Yes it is very difficult how you define a synthetic, Mobile took Castrol to court and lost. The definition has seemed to morphed into more of a performance level than a quality level of base stock. A Group III "synthetic" can no way hold a candle to a Group IV synthetic from a performance venue. As I have stated both of these base stock types receive additives to make a "finished" lubricant. The whole is equal to the sum of its parts
A synthetic basestock is one that is created chemically, NOT one that is highly refined petroleum.

Ken


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.