Trim Tabs Angle
#12
I have hydro props that lift the stern well, but on lake michigan well the swells are deep the front end seems to want to bounce up and down to much. When I put the tabs all the way down it does help alot...it seems if I had a bit more tab down force that the boat would be more stable in the rough. My tabs are long enough, I just think they would work better if the downforce was in line with the surface of the water.
#13
Registered
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: chesapeake bay md
Originally Posted by 32 caliber
I have hydro props that lift the stern well, but on lake michigan well the swells are deep the front end seems to want to bounce up and down to much. When I put the tabs all the way down it does help alot...it seems if I had a bit more tab down force that the boat would be more stable in the rough. My tabs are long enough, I just think they would work better if the downforce was in line with the surface of the water.
#14
My understanding is that mounting the tabs flat was a solution to a chinewalking problem. As far as lifting performance goes, I think it is a wash either way. With the tabs parallel to the running surface, the tab is in the optimal contact to the water to make lift, but that lift vector is not directed straight up. With the tabs set level, they are not meeting the flow straight on, and will actually funnel water back toward the boat centerline, and that momentum reaction will cause an outward force in addition to an upward force. The relative quantaties of all of these can be computed on a by-boat basis, but in the end, realize that the tabs are only needed for transom lift through getting on plane and maintaining longitudinal/vertical stability from porpoising through the midrange. If you need anything in the top end, it's only going to be the tip of the tab anyway, and it's efficiency as a pure lifting surface is not nearly as big of a concern as how much lift the incredibly small angles of attack can produce at high speeds, and how the boat will react to it.
#17
Originally Posted by tcelano
My understanding is that mounting the tabs flat was a solution to a chinewalking problem. As far as lifting performance goes, I think it is a wash either way. With the tabs parallel to the running surface, the tab is in the optimal contact to the water to make lift, but that lift vector is not directed straight up. With the tabs set level, they are not meeting the flow straight on, and will actually funnel water back toward the boat centerline, and that momentum reaction will cause an outward force in addition to an upward force. The relative quantaties of all of these can be computed on a by-boat basis, but in the end, realize that the tabs are only needed for transom lift through getting on plane and maintaining longitudinal/vertical stability from porpoising through the midrange. If you need anything in the top end, it's only going to be the tip of the tab anyway, and it's efficiency as a pure lifting surface is not nearly as big of a concern as how much lift the incredibly small angles of attack can produce at high speeds, and how the boat will react to it.
#18
I posted a thread in the fountain owners area, here was a responce..
According to Fountain, "to get more leverage while reducing wetted surface drag". I guess they have been doing it on the racing boats and it makes a big difference in tab effectiveness.
It is good to see that racing technology works itself down to the production level.
Sounds like I'm on the right track with my thinking....
According to Fountain, "to get more leverage while reducing wetted surface drag". I guess they have been doing it on the racing boats and it makes a big difference in tab effectiveness.
It is good to see that racing technology works itself down to the production level.
Sounds like I'm on the right track with my thinking....



