Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
496 Exhaust restriction picture >

496 Exhaust restriction picture

Notices

496 Exhaust restriction picture

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-28-2006, 01:17 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
fbh-velocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 496 Exhaust restriction picture

Originally Posted by Kanookstr
Unfortunately they were not designed for water reversion. They are designed to trap any condensation that might occur after engine shut down. By trapping this condensation it prevents any chances that the condensation can reach the iron valve seats/guides. this problem is seen more in the northern states where the water is much colder. It is more of a problem for people who keep there boats in the water. A proper idle down time before stopping the engine will help reduce the chance of this condensation from happening, They will do nothing to stop or prevent reversion. The fact that they reduce the exhaust hole from 3 1/4 down to 2 1/4 is a definite restriction.

I plan on cutting mine down to maybe 3" so to have some protection , but better flow.
If you are worried about the problem by removing them, then going to an after market exhaust will still give you the same condensation problem, because the after market exhaust don't have the tubulater design neither.

The picture is also deceiving because the cut is not thru the center. So you can't really see the 1" difference in hole size.
Upss..I mix up those two terms, you are absolutly right, itīs prevent water CONDENSATION not reversion. GIL marine exhaust also sells this plate and just call them turbolatorplate.
fbh-velocity is offline  
Old 04-28-2006, 08:06 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Chris288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 496 Exhaust restriction picture

I took mine out and wasn't completely happy w/ the results,,, the motor was pulled to replace the transom assembly and gimble, the dealer doing the work re-installed them, i'm gonna see how she runs before I decide if i'm gonna take them out again.. I honestly dont think there are any measureable gains I know some people have seen 2-3 mph, I couldn't even be sure I saw 1 mph..
Chris288 is offline  
Old 04-28-2006, 01:36 PM
  #13  
Rob
VIP Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Strip Poker 388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ms
Posts: 21,632
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: 496 Exhaust restriction picture

I was told by people that sell the CMI's for the 496's you may not see a increase.



They do look restrictive
__________________
.

The Only Time You Have To Much Ammo Is When Your Swimming Or On Fire.
Strip Poker 388 is offline  
Old 04-28-2006, 01:39 PM
  #14  
32' SUNSATION
Platinum Member
 
Kanookstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 496 Exhaust restriction picture

Originally Posted by Chris288
I took mine out and wasn't completely happy w/ the results,,, the motor was pulled to replace the transom assembly and gimble, the dealer doing the work re-installed them, i'm gonna see how she runs before I decide if i'm gonna take them out again.. I honestly dont think there are any measureable gains I know some people have seen 2-3 mph, I couldn't even be sure I saw 1 mph..
Yes but if I remember Chris, didn't you Try without the plates first thing after winter storage? And ended up having an other problem so you weren't to sure that it was due to the plates.?
I would definitely try a practice ride and then remove them the same day to do a good comparison. So far everyone I talked too noticed at least 150 more rpm.
Kanookstr is offline  
Old 04-28-2006, 01:42 PM
  #15  
32' SUNSATION
Platinum Member
 
Kanookstr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MA
Posts: 1,143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 496 Exhaust restriction picture

Originally Posted by Strip Poker 388
I was told by people that sell the CMI's for the 496's you may not see a increase.



They do look restrictive
If I was selling a $4000. product I wouldn't want to admit removing a restrictive turbulator plate for $ 0.00. would show some increase

Knowing there has been numerous dyno tests showing averages from 10 - 15 hp increase is good enough for me.
Now take that times 2 engines

Last edited by Kanookstr; 04-28-2006 at 01:48 PM.
Kanookstr is offline  
Old 05-04-2006, 07:52 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 496 Exhaust restriction picture

I saw a noticeable increase in power, maybe as much as 2 mph, but that is on a boat that's just 21 feet in length and very responsive to power increases (i.e. when going from 300 hp to 425 hp I picked up more than 15 mph). Mid-range torque seems to have abit more pop as well. The gaskets cost just $10 a piece, and the swap is not very time consuming - I'd recommend to anyone that they at least try it.
bouncedcheque is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 05:40 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The OC / Lake Havasu
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Resrictor plates on HP 500 also????

I know many have had success with removing the restrictor plates from the 496 mag/ho exhaust. I have an HP500 and was looking at some diagrams of the GIL Exhaust for this motor. It appears that this motor also has restrictor plates. see link below.

http://www.mercruiserparts.com/Show_...NIFOLD%2FELBOW

Anybody have any experience with these on the HP500?

Thanks.
frdvschvy is offline  
Old 07-12-2007, 03:19 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Big Block Billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Babylon N.Y.
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Originally Posted by fbh-velocity
The reason why the restrictor plate are build in is to prevent water reversion. Under run it gets really hot caused to the thin sheet metal and non cooling area and will catch the water and steam it out. Just an insurance from factory
BINGO ! What a way to hit the nail on the head !
look at the old Gil manifolds and they have a similiar plate for the exact same reason. BBB
Big Block Billy is offline  
Old 02-27-2021, 10:09 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have been reading up on 496 MAG posts after newly joining this forum. I will be pulling risers to inspect this spring and was boning up on the manifold design. Those cut outs are a great view! There are good articles on Perfpro tech and hardin marine about turbulators. The bluf is they are to accelerate exhaust flow up and out (along with any moisture buildup) and trap moisture buildup which may occur during the cooling process. They will provide exhaust backpressure and pressure drop but in the end I would not hesitate to risk changing the design to get a few more hp and will be spending the money to re-install them as designed.
PENN YAN is offline  
Old 02-27-2021, 11:37 AM
  #20  
Registered
iTrader: (6)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 5,825
Received 607 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PENN YAN
I have been reading up on 496 MAG posts after newly joining this forum. I will be pulling risers to inspect this spring and was boning up on the manifold design. Those cut outs are a great view! There are good articles on Perfpro tech and hardin marine about turbulators. The bluf is they are to accelerate exhaust flow up and out (along with any moisture buildup) and trap moisture buildup which may occur during the cooling process. They will provide exhaust backpressure and pressure drop but in the end I would not hesitate to risk changing the design to get a few more hp and will be spending the money to re-install them as designed.
This is an ancient thread but my Donzi 22 came with a 496 HO. I installed CMI headers for $6,000 and saw ZERO performance increase. My manifolds were the aluminum versions and the ports are huge. Now I'm running a 525 which does need the headers. If you have the aluminum manifolds then leave them alone!
thirdchildhood is offline  
The following users liked this post:
87MirageIntruder (02-27-2021)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikaylaHunterCig
General Q & A
9
02-27-2021 11:37 AM
tomas_wallin
Pantera
10
05-03-2007 06:03 AM
Fountaineer
General Q & A
3
11-01-2005 05:52 PM
tewks
General Q & A
0
06-28-2004 04:22 PM
bouncedcheque
General Q & A
1
02-27-2004 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: 496 Exhaust restriction picture


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.