Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
XR lower compared to Imco lower >

XR lower compared to Imco lower

Notices

XR lower compared to Imco lower

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-04-2006 | 07:52 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Default XR lower compared to Imco lower

My mechanic has my drive to repair upper gears. He stated that the lower is usually the weak link in the XR. My uppers were probably damaged by abuse from previous owner.

I have installed a Whipple on top of a 600hp JC Performance motor and am looking to "bullet proof" my drive, if possible. Boat is a Superboat 30 Y2K, approx 5400 lbs wet.

Would an Imco lower be a better alternative??

Or a totally diff drive such as the B-Max

Or with careful driving and proper maintenance will the XR hold up?

Thanks
Pure Energy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2006 | 09:33 AM
  #2  
zt260's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Hudson River, NY
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

What HP are you at now? That will decide your fate.
zt260 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2006 | 09:58 AM
  #3  
Vinny P's Avatar
I hate the winter!!
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
From: long island, new york
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

Besides the bullet, the Imco lower is about the same as an XR. The shafts are different but I am not sure they are any stronger. I am proof of that. They both use the same gears from Merc, so no difference there. I like the fact that the drive gear in an Imco lower is fastened to the vertical shaft with a huge nut, unlike the small bolt on the XR. Not sure how much of a difference that makes, but I just like it better. The Imco lower bearing carrier is billet, that would be better than Mercs. Imco claims their bearings are better, dont know how true that is. Most rebuilders end up using Timken bearings anyway. Wouldnt be surprised if Imco bearings are Timkens to begin with. They just charge you triple for them.
Vinny P is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2006 | 02:08 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

600 hp + Whipple 2.3 liter

I am spinnig the drive left if that makes a difference.
Pure Energy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-05-2006 | 02:37 PM
  #5  
BBB725's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 1
From: Wi/ Fl Keys
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

I ran Merc XZ uppers with IMCO lowers for three years without any problems. Triple N/A 598ci 725hp motors
BBB725 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 09:04 AM
  #6  
zt260's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Hudson River, NY
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

Originally Posted by Pure Energy
600 hp + Whipple 2.3 liter

I am spinnig the drive left if that makes a difference.

So what are we talking here? 800+HP?

Assuming that, you will be breaking a lot of drives. The BMAX will handle the most power out of the box. But the lower will still be the weakest link. I’ve blowen a few lowers, but never the upper. That’s with significantly more HP. Presently BMAX is switching out my lower gears to new coated gears. If it makes a season I’ll be happy.

Spinning left will make the drive more prone to failure. The top cap takes most of the stress. I would switch to right, especially if you use an XR upper. The top cap is pretty weak.
zt260 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 09:36 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 3
From: N. NJ, Eastern LI
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

zt260, thanks for the info. My motor is a 540 and I think it will be closer to 725.
Pure Energy is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 09:54 AM
  #8  
zt260's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
From: Hudson River, NY
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

At 725Hp you have options.

The BMAX will last very well at 725, it will be basically bulletproof.

The XR can handle the power if it's setup perfectly and maintained. If you beat on it, it will break. I would upgrade some parts and go to right hand rotation.

You might want to consider another drive and having a spare. That's what I was doing a couple years ago. I'm selling my XR Sportmaster spare. It's in the swap section.

Last edited by zt260; 04-07-2006 at 08:14 AM.
zt260 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 10:57 AM
  #9  
Panther's Avatar
Frank's Marine Service
20 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,959
Likes: 142
From: Elkton, MD
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

I have some IMCO Extreme's for sale in the classifieds and also and Extreme Upper.

How big is the boat and what is the weight?
Panther is offline  
Reply
Old 03-06-2006 | 04:51 PM
  #10  
ratman's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 7
From: medellin colombia, pablo escobar's lil town
Default Re: XR lower compared to Imco lower

cant advise you on the drives but i would check out the konrad unit. BTW
I have installed a Whipple on top of a 600hp JC Performance motor
you might want to put a few extra layers of duct tape on the oil pan to catch parts that come thru the oil pan
ratman is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.