my bravo outdrive gear experiment
#11
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Originally Posted by RLW
Have you ever considered Cryogenic treating the gears?
One of our members, Jpclear, had his gears treated for his TRS. He is running all of 650 HP through this drive with zero problems to date. He could embellish more on his success than I can.
Check out the sites listed below.
http://www.onecryo.com/onecryo/manuf...manmarch98.htm
http://www.onecryo.com/onecryo/motorsport-imssept98.htm
One of our members, Jpclear, had his gears treated for his TRS. He is running all of 650 HP through this drive with zero problems to date. He could embellish more on his success than I can.
Check out the sites listed below.
http://www.onecryo.com/onecryo/manuf...manmarch98.htm
http://www.onecryo.com/onecryo/motorsport-imssept98.htm
#12
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Originally Posted by Ratickle
There are a lot of different heat treat processes depending on what is required for the usage. More important than the final RC and the depth of hardness is the material being used. I would imagine those gears are some kind of tool steel like H2, H13, M2, etc. Does anyone know for sure or did the heat treater you used run a spectrometer burn to determine? If you know, let me know and I will get a couple metallurgist's I know to review and give their opinions. If the metal was only at a higher rockwell a few thou deep, and a lower rockwell deeper, I would suspect they were used gears and had work-hardened on the surface. On most metals the harder you go, the more brittle it becomes. Your pictures look like an issue with brittleness vs hardness (I could be way off base though). Processes used in high heat/high wear applications have also been improved with the use of new coating processes. Different titanium coatings(plating) have been used extensively in cutting tools, die-cast dies, and gears. Some of the best coaters there are are in the Detroit area. If nothing else can be determined, I will have you send your broken gears to me and we will run them on the spectrograph at work and also take RC tests at different depths. One more tidbit, typically heat-treat will remove carbon from the surface on all carbon steels. The higher the carbon, the harder the steel will become. In most critical surface issue products they will harden the steel in a carbon atmosphere(carborize) so the loss will be minimized and the surface will be hard. When testing for hardness, the actual approved process tells you to grind the surface of the steel to a depth of .010 to remove the decarb area where you will get a false reading.
#13
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
I read the link to cryo treating you posted RLW,we never did it for 36 hours,only a hour at the most plus we never did it in a controlled enviroment where we lowered the temp in 1 1/2 degree increments every minute,maybe there is some merit to it and I prematurely condemed it from my crude attempts at it,Smitty
#14
Registered
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
I'm really surprised they are 8620. On 8620 (the last two digits denoting the carbon content, 20 allowing a range from .15% to .25%), getting them extremely hard would cause brittleness. I have a friend who worked on the propellor development metallurgy for Mercury. I will print out all of this post and have him review the processes and see if he can use any of his contacts to find out more from Merc. Also 9310 would have less carbon than 8620 and therefore be unable to achieve the same Rockwell hardness as 8620. I've never had a requirement for 9310 but will find out it's properties and recommended usages. You may not need to send the gears, I'm sure I can find some broken one's over here. I will persue this because now I am very interested in the metallurgy and reasoning behind it. It's kind of like props, everyone thinks they are 316, but 15-5 or 17-4 is what most are made out of.
#15
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
How about also having gears x-rayed and or magnafluxed or zyglowed.
Bam has a treatment for gears. They coat alot of Trs stuff.
Sure Bravo's can be made better, but the real answer is a bigger drive with bigger internal parts. The rear axle of the smallest cars has more beefy internal parts than any outdrive, and the car's not working hard, and not trying to process 950 HP.
Do a Konrad conversion , and you will be able to use the boat more and work on it less. It really is an awesome drive setup. My friend went for it on his 38 kv Scarab, and no longer has to worry about blowing up drives ! That was with 720 HP. BBB
Bam has a treatment for gears. They coat alot of Trs stuff.
Sure Bravo's can be made better, but the real answer is a bigger drive with bigger internal parts. The rear axle of the smallest cars has more beefy internal parts than any outdrive, and the car's not working hard, and not trying to process 950 HP.
Do a Konrad conversion , and you will be able to use the boat more and work on it less. It really is an awesome drive setup. My friend went for it on his 38 kv Scarab, and no longer has to worry about blowing up drives ! That was with 720 HP. BBB
#16
Registered
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Originally Posted by Big Block Billy
Do a Konrad conversion , and you will be able to use the boat more and work on it less. It really is an awesome drive setup. BBB
#17
Charter Member #601
Charter Member
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Ratickle,
I have plenty of gears that could be tested.. Your welcome to them.. I am very much interested in any results also..
Thanks
Dick
I have plenty of gears that could be tested.. Your welcome to them.. I am very much interested in any results also..
Thanks
Dick
#18
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Originally Posted by Big Block Billy
How about also having gears x-rayed and or magnafluxed or zyglowed.
Bam has a treatment for gears. They coat alot of Trs stuff.
Sure Bravo's can be made better, but the real answer is a bigger drive with bigger internal parts. The rear axle of the smallest cars has more beefy internal parts than any outdrive, and the car's not working hard, and not trying to process 950 HP.
Do a Konrad conversion , and you will be able to use the boat more and work on it less. It really is an awesome drive setup. My friend went for it on his 38 kv Scarab, and no longer has to worry about blowing up drives ! That was with 720 HP. BBB
Bam has a treatment for gears. They coat alot of Trs stuff.
Sure Bravo's can be made better, but the real answer is a bigger drive with bigger internal parts. The rear axle of the smallest cars has more beefy internal parts than any outdrive, and the car's not working hard, and not trying to process 950 HP.
Do a Konrad conversion , and you will be able to use the boat more and work on it less. It really is an awesome drive setup. My friend went for it on his 38 kv Scarab, and no longer has to worry about blowing up drives ! That was with 720 HP. BBB
Last edited by articfriends; 09-20-2006 at 03:01 PM.
#19
Masher touches my
Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Off the subject Smitty but what fuel pump are you running? I just ditched the Carter I had and put an 11108 Aeromotive in it's place. The way AZSM had it plumbed was, gas tank with 1/2 lines, Carter fuel pump, Merc seperator, fuel cooler and regulator with a return to the seperator, last to the fuel rail. I'm wondering if I should have a return somewhere on the other side of the pump or back to the tank. To tell you the truth I think the stock pump is still in there and hooked up at the fuel cooler. My biggest concern would be adding a return line to the tank, how can you do that without emtying the tank and cleaning it if you are tapping a fitting into it?
#20
Registered
Re: my bravo outdrive gear experiment
Originally Posted by BADKACHINA
My biggest concern would be adding a return line to the tank, how can you do that without emtying the tank and cleaning it if you are tapping a fitting into it?