Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
SeaRay vs. Larson >

SeaRay vs. Larson

Notices

SeaRay vs. Larson

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-13-2006, 11:41 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
zt260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hudson River, NY
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default SeaRay vs. Larson

A friend is in the market for a new boat. What do you think about the SeaRay Sundeck 220 and the Larson LXi 248? The Searay has the Merc 5.0 with the Bravo 3 and the Larson has the 350 Mag with the Bravo 3. The price is very similar.

I don't know these manufacturers well enough to help him. It all comes down to which hull is built better. At first thought I figured the SeaRay, but neither hull is for me.

Anyone have some experience to share?
zt260 is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 11:53 AM
  #2  
SORE MEMBER
Platinum Member
 
Wobble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 29°50'49.74"N 95° 5'17.55"W.......TEXAS
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

Larson is a low bucks type boat. My neighbour had one, the rigging was awful particularily the stuff that was out of sight.

Resale value was hopeless. Dealers wouldnt even make an offer on a clean low hours boat.

He bought a Formula 330SS this time, I had a good look around it and I am very impressed. Sea Ray are very good quality boats also from what I have seen. My buddy owns a 1990 Pachanga with many hours on it, very solid.
Wobble is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 12:04 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Prater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Blanchard, OK
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

Go here and you will get lots of replies on the comparison between the two:

www.searayowners.com
Prater is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 12:15 PM
  #4  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Shore Thing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hollywood, MD
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

We've had sea-ray's in the family since 1977, with the latest one being a 2006 48 sundancer. I have nothing but good things to say about the product and the service.
Shore Thing is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 12:24 PM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Omaha, Nebraska. Boat on the Mighty Mo! Longest river in the USA!
Posts: 1,944
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

SeaRay is the only choice

I don't think you will be happy with this paticular boat
with the Merc 5.0. My second boat I ever bought had one, the following year it had the 5.7 350

Today anything under 496 cubic inches is to small
1BIGJIM is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 12:25 PM
  #6  
21 and 42 footers
Platinum Member
 
t500hps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8,183
Received 119 Likes on 61 Posts
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

I've had a number of Searay cruisers and they are well built but the runabouts have been cheapened down to compete on price since the late 90's. I am friends with a dealer that sold Searay for many years and then sold Larsons for the last 2...they just dropped them because they are junk. I wouldn't recommend either!
Look at Chaparral (a buddy just bought a 220 with the 5.0mpi BIII and trailer for around 40k out the door), Bryant are supposed to be nice, even Rinker has come along way since the early 90's and is a good value for the price (still not as good as Chaparral)
t500hps is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 01:09 PM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
zt260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hudson River, NY
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

Any recommendations on a better built hull that’s similar to the searay?
zt260 is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 01:22 PM
  #8  
SORE MEMBER
Platinum Member
 
Wobble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 29°50'49.74"N 95° 5'17.55"W.......TEXAS
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

Originally Posted by zt260
Any recommendations on a better built hull that’s similar to the searay?
I'd put Formula right there with Sea Ray as far as quality goes. Maybe better in the runabout category
Wobble is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 01:58 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ankeny IA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

Four Winns.

Mine's older, but my buddy has a 2003 22'(?) Horizon that is wonderful. Built like a tank.
jmherbert is offline  
Old 07-13-2006, 02:20 PM
  #10  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Hydrocruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Arrow Re: SeaRay vs. Larson

Originally Posted by Wobble
I'd put Formula right there with Sea Ray as far as quality goes. Maybe better in the runabout category
agreed...if one is looking to save a buck and get a great boat Rinker is a better choice than a Bayliner or Larson...the DeltaConic hull on some Larsons is a inefficient hull for speed anyways..

http://www.rinkerboats.com/index_tem...e=cruiser_show

Last edited by Hydrocruiser; 07-13-2006 at 02:31 PM.
Hydrocruiser is offline  


Quick Reply: SeaRay vs. Larson


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.