Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
540 C.I. project >

540 C.I. project

Notices

540 C.I. project

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-20-2006 | 09:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default 540 C.I. project

how much hp and torque should this combination produce.

4.530 bore bowtie block
4.250 stroke steel crank
9to1 compresion forged pistons
Intake 578 lift 311 duration
Exhaust 592 lift 316 duration
870 cfm carb holley
stock steel rectagulur heads
edelbrock air gap intake manifold
riski bidness is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 09:46 AM
  #2  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

575-600 hp in marine trim,closer to 650 on the dyno with dry stepped tube dyno headers and no accessories,thats my guess. If you haven't bought cam yet consult with RMbuilder,he will ensure cam is optimum for your exact application,Smitty
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,093
Likes: 3,683
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

No guesses. Interesting combo of parts. DO you have more cam specs or atleast cam man and part# ?
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 12:18 PM
  #4  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

Originally Posted by SB
No guesses. Interesting combo of parts. DO you have more cam specs or atleast cam man and part# ?
SB is right,without real complete specs the it is just a w.a.g,Smitty
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 12:59 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

cam is a crower hydraulic non roller
riski bidness is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 01:08 PM
  #6  
duunoit's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

Originally Posted by riski bidness
4.530 bore bowtie block
4.250 stroke steel crank
Did you mean 4.500 bore? I think that 4.530 would make it bigger than 540.
duunoit is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 02:19 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

builder says 4.530
riski bidness is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2006 | 10:13 PM
  #8  
JimV's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 709
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids Mi. U.S.
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

That cam looks like it has too much duration. Whats the numbers @ .050?
JimV is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2006 | 10:54 AM
  #9  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,093
Likes: 3,683
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

I found it. I don't know if Crower does seat duration at .004" or .006" . Here is the info from http://www.crower.com/misc/cam_spec/...um=01245&prn=1 :

Crower Camshaft Specification Card
Part Number/Work Order Number 01245
Engine Application 396-454 CHEVY
Grind Number 311HDP
ADVERTISED CAMSHAFT SPECIFICATIONS:
INTAKE: Duration: 311º Lift: 0.578 Clearence Hot: 0
EXHAUST: Duration: 316º Lift: 0.592 Clearence Hot: 0
The specifications listed above are based on a rockerarm ratio of 1.7 IN
1.7 EX

RECOMMENDED VALVE SPRING INFORMATION:
Part # 68340 Single Dual X Triple
Approximate spring pressure: valve closed: 110/120 LBS.
valve open: 320/330 LBS.

The information below is for degreeing cam only. Correct only at .050" tappet lift.

INTAKE

Opens: 15.0 BTDC
Closes: 51.0 ABDC


EXHAUST

Opens: 61.0 BBDC
Closes: 9.0 ATDC


LOBE SEPERATION

112º


Duration at .050"

Intake: 246
Exhaust: 250


LOBE LIFT

Intake: 0.34
Exhaust: 0.348



If using "Lobe Center" method of degreeing, cam should be installed on an intake centerline of: 108º
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2006 | 11:44 AM
  #10  
rmbuilder's Avatar
MarineKinetics
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Default Re: 540 C.I. project

Riski Bidness,

Looking at the figures:
311º/316º Seat
246º/250º .050"
.340"/. 348" Lobe
.578"/. 592" Valve
65/66 Hydraulic Intensity

This is a textbook example in the inherent design limitations of flat tappet camshafts. Flats are velocity (rate of change of lift) limited vs. roller tappets, which are acceleration (rate of change of velocity) limited. The max velocity of the lifter varies according to (flat) tappet diameter, further compounding the issue for Chevrolets, with the smallest lifter diameter in the industry @ .842". The max velocity for a .842" lifter is 0.00714" (in/deg) per degree of rotation. By design, the only way to bring lift to the required values is to increase duration. With this comes the challenge of managing the byproducts of increased duration, one of which is overlap. This is the reason for the relatively modest lift value for this cam given the comparatively long seat and .050" values.

In contrast, a roller lifter is acceleration limited and velocity unlimited within the ability to control the mass of the valve train. The roller profile will yield significantly greater lift values with less seat and .050" duration figures and more importantly, greater lobe area. The reduced duration values may make the cam “look" smaller where actually it is not. Valves are opened “quicker/further/faster" providing more mid range and peak TQ.

In this application, if it is within your budget, a well-designed roller cam will provide significantly more performance, a more useable TQ/HP curve, in a more manageable package.

Bob

Last edited by rmbuilder; 07-21-2006 at 11:51 AM.
rmbuilder is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.