Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
The ultimate "poor man's Drive" >

The ultimate "poor man's Drive"

Notices

The ultimate "poor man's Drive"

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-31-2007, 09:58 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Posts: 1,988
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

What ever happened with the Weissmann's package?
Attached Thumbnails The ultimate "poor man's Drive"-weissmann-drive.jpg  
2112 is offline  
Old 03-31-2007, 10:08 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
monstaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B BOATER
Hey bud I hear you loud and clear! I dont want to go to that extreme plus you will scrub power and speed from the number 6 drive. We are waiting for one last try. We have gone through all brands none hold up what they claim. There maybe a new choice soon coming from Pfaff racing dont know when they will be introduced but they claim handling 1000hp motors. They are being tested on a 1500hp motor right now with great results. No promises here but if its true we are lined up with one as soon as possible.
with all due there is really no scrub or power loss due to the 6 and tranny. as a matter of fact the same boat , same weight same power was faster with the 6's over bravos.(dry sump)

point is there really is no substitution for it in a case like this. you can pick up a used 6 and gimbal for what your gonna spend on a maybe upgrade.

id look around
good luck
monstaaa is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:39 AM
  #23  
Charter Member #927
Charter Member
 
Payton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 4,834
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by monstaaa
with all due there is really no scrub or power loss due to the 6 and tranny. as a matter of fact the same boat , same weight same power was faster with the 6's over bravos.(dry sump)

point is there really is no substitution for it in a case like this. you can pick up a used 6 and gimbal for what your gonna spend on a maybe upgrade.

id look around
good luck
But, he then will have to move the engine forward to make room for the trany. Does anyone make a trans in extension box setup for a #6? I know the NXT is like that but it can only be purchased in a package. Can the Konrad Ace transome assembly and box be made to fit a #6? Seems like that would solve the problem.
Payton is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 09:47 AM
  #24  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA/1000 Islands
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LostinBoston
Do you know how much the sage drive costs vs arneson 7 or merc 6?
Here is the details from the link I provided.

Sage # 8 drive $ 20,000
Sage, zero effort shiftable tranny $ 5,000
t-islands is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 12:00 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Posts: 1,988
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by monstaaa
with all due there is really no scrub or power loss due to the 6 and tranny. as a matter of fact the same boat , same weight same power was faster with the 6's over bravos.(dry sump)

point is there really is no substitution for it in a case like this. you can pick up a used 6 and gimbal for what your gonna spend on a maybe upgrade.

id look around
good luck
What reinforcement to the transom is necessary moving from a bravo to a #6?
2112 is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 12:55 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
monstaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: long island, newyork
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2112
What reinforcement to the transom is necessary moving from a bravo to a #6?
none if the transom is in good shape.

and if you go 6 youll need to slide the engine forward bout 11-14 inches,

you can also use a waet sump which is less desireable, but more affordable.
monstaaa is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:05 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

monstaaa you are telling it takes less power to turn a transmission and larger gears? I understand dry sump is more efficient than they wet #6 but I cant believe its easier than a bravo one.
B BOATER is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:08 PM
  #28  
Charter Member #927
Charter Member
 
Payton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: IN
Posts: 4,834
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I believe it takes more power to turn the trans and #6, but the #6 goes thru the water so much better that you gain with the 6
Payton is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 05:55 PM
  #29  
PF Marine
Platinum Member
 
Coolerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,787
Received 22 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The 6 is faster because it is dry-sumped and it is also has better hydrodynamics to it.
Coolerman is offline  
Old 04-02-2007, 11:11 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Socialist Republic of Washington State
Posts: 1,988
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by monstaaa
none if the transom is in good shape.

and if you go 6 youll need to slide the engine forward bout 11-14 inches,

you can also use a waet sump which is less desireable, but more affordable.
Hasn't anyone hung the tranny in the standoff box? If they did, what transom requirements are we talking about now?
2112 is offline  


Quick Reply: The ultimate "poor man's Drive"


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.