Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
What if you had a CVT in a boat? >

What if you had a CVT in a boat?

Notices

What if you had a CVT in a boat?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-02-2008 | 05:59 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by DORaymond
Would that be 1000/2000 horsepower & torque?
Nope. The only thing that occurs that isn't double is revolutions which is halved.
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2008 | 06:18 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 432
Likes: 5
Default

HP is work over time. HP can not be multiplied by gearing. Only torque.

HP = t * rpm/5252. So, 1000 hp 1000 ft lbs at 5000 rpm at 2:1.. means 2000 ft lbs and 1000 hp at 2500 rpm.

HP is the same through a whole system minus friction losses.

I didn't argue that above because Chris' point still stands, since the torque will kill the drive more so than HP.

I did learn some things in Kinematics of machinery
Joe92GT is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2008 | 06:29 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,495
Likes: 6
Default

Yes, of course you're correct. Late afternoon brain-fade.
Chris Sunkin is offline  
Reply
Old 01-02-2008 | 07:35 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 432
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Sunkin
Yes, of course you're correct. Late afternoon brain-fade.
I was hoping you were right! It would solve the world's energy problem!
Joe92GT is offline  
Reply
Old 01-03-2008 | 08:49 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,710
Likes: 2
From: MT. JULIET, TN.
Default

Originally Posted by sleeper_dave
Developement on CVT's has all but ceased by the auto makers. They just can't be made efficient or strong enough. Then there's the issue of driver perception. What good is a CVT if you have to program it to have artificial "gears" so that the driver doesn't think his tranny is slipping. CVTs are dead in the automotive world, and you don't want to think about inflicting that kind of extra pain on yourself by trying to put one in your boat. You think bravo's fail a lot... a CVT would last about as long as an alpha beind a 1075.

CVTs are fine for snowmobiles, but making them handle the abuse a car can put out, let alone a marine engine, is a big hurdle that will likely never be overcome, simply because of the lack of percieved benefit. Someone would have to come up with a new way of making a CVT, there is only so far you can go with belts and pullies when it comes to transmitting torque.
Don't tell NIssan that. JUst about all their cars are CVT autos now. ( Maxima, altima, etc..)
kennyo is offline  
Reply
Old 01-05-2008 | 12:33 PM
  #16  
J-Bonz's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,975
Likes: 495
From: Cleveland, OH / Pewaukee, WI
Default

Originally Posted by Joe92GT
HP is work over time. HP can not be multiplied by gearing. Only torque.

HP = t * rpm/5252. So, 1000 hp 1000 ft lbs at 5000 rpm at 2:1.. means 2000 ft lbs and 1000 hp at 2500 rpm.

HP is the same through a whole system minus friction losses.

I didn't argue that above because Chris' point still stands, since the torque will kill the drive more so than HP.

I did learn some things in Kinematics of machinery
Right on....................
J-Bonz is offline  
Reply
Old 01-05-2008 | 12:45 PM
  #17  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default

I think a 2 speed tranny would be enough..
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-2008 | 09:19 PM
  #18  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Sunkin
Diesels would be the application that would see the least amount of benefit considering their exceptionally broad torque curve.
I would like to dispel the myth that diesels have a broad torque curve once and for all (yeah, like that's going to happen). If you look at a diesel's torque curve with the X-axis being RPM/Maximum RPM (which normalizes that axis for comparison to a gasoline engine), the diesel's torque curve is awful! It plummets below 0.5 RPM ratio, because the turbo boost is falling rapidly below that RPM. If you overlay the torque curve for a naturally aspirated gasoline engine, such as the 496, the gas engine appears almost flat from an RPM ratio of 0.2 and up. The curves are available from GM, Cummins, and others. Volvo has tried to overcome the diesel's poor torque curve by adding a mechanically driven roots blower IN ADDITION to the turbo. The blower is coupled to the engine with an electric clutch, similar to that used for an A/C compressor in your car, so it only engages at low engine speed. Unfortunately, I have not seen any published torque curves to see how well the system works.

Michael

Last edited by Michael1; 01-13-2008 at 09:24 PM.
Michael1 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Von Bongo
General Boating Discussion
16
09-11-2004 10:59 AM
BK
General Boating Discussion
0
03-11-2004 10:12 AM
Hauling Trash
General Boating Discussion
7
06-11-2002 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.