Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Compression ratio difference w/ aluminum Heads??? >

Compression ratio difference w/ aluminum Heads???

Notices

Compression ratio difference w/ aluminum Heads???

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-16-2008, 07:56 AM
  #11  
Registered
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If you're running in salt water, you're better off with cast-iron heads. I've pulled many aluminum heads that were junk after a few years.
Edward R. Cozzi is offline  
Old 02-16-2008, 08:37 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
PatriYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waterford,MI
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have heard that aluminum heads, all things being equal, lose a few hp because of higher heat conductivity. They usually flow better and that's why they make more power. I think alum. is better in fresh water because they're lighter but in salt they corrode to fast.
PatriYacht is offline  
Old 02-16-2008, 02:14 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The water jackets can be anodised to protect the aluminum. Remember, most every high performance intake, along with intercoolers are aluminum. Plus every jet ski motor made, and all outboards. Don't worry about aluminum in the motor. Just flush with salt away when finished.



Darrell.
DMOORE is offline  
Old 02-21-2008, 02:25 PM
  #14  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was only speaking to the impact to motor performance of aluminum metal versus cast iron metal as a head material. In other words the exact same heads except one made form aluminum and the other cast iron.


Originally Posted by Edward R. Cozzi
I doubt that's true as a rule because most aftermarket aluminum heads flow better than the stock cast-iron heads, are therefore more efficient and make more power. I learned this straight from Randy Garciga from Cobra Power, so it is not something I'm making up.
Rage is offline  
Old 02-21-2008, 05:17 PM
  #15  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Rage,
I doubt you are going to find many/any on OSO that have made two idenitical sets of heads (except for the metal type ) and then done back to back dyno testing/comparisons. as the engine is an air pump, it doesn't care what metal is used in the heads. The power should be close to the dsame if all else was equal. Aluminim is lighter (faster) and cast iron is more corosion resistant. Power? ...same.
BenPerfected is offline  
Old 02-22-2008, 02:21 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Revelocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Warwick, MD USA
Posts: 670
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Here's a related question that if I had a Desk Top Dyno program - I woudn't have to ask. Given that aluminum heads can tolerate a higher compression ratio for a given fuel grade, is there any rule of thumb that says if one increases the compresion ratio from say 8.75:1 to 9.75:1 (an 11% increase) and ALL ELSE REMAINS THE SAME, that horsepower will increase x %? I'm sure the relationship tails off with higher compression ratios but for THIS range can anyone offer an estimate of % HP increase? I'm trying to figure what higher compression potentially delivers in extra horsepower. Thanks.
Revelocity is offline  
Old 03-03-2008, 11:38 AM
  #17  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh yes it does. You are missing the point. The higher the combustion temperature the more power, the lower the combustion temperature the lower the power on a given engine. This is where the better thermal condutivity of aluminum versus cast iron can reduce power. Conversely that same characteristic can reduce potential of detonation thus allowing aluminum heads to be designed with higher effective compression ratios which can gain back power. I have no idea if it is a wash or if the increased compression ratio capability produces more power gain than is lost to quenching of combustion temperature or the opposite.

There is no limit of things to take into account in head design differences and material choices. The comment above was intended to discuss only one, aluminum versus cast iron and its effect on power all things being equal.


Originally Posted by BenPerfected
Rage,
I doubt you are going to find many/any on OSO that have made two idenitical sets of heads (except for the metal type ) and then done back to back dyno testing/comparisons. as the engine is an air pump, it doesn't care what metal is used in the heads. The power should be close to the dsame if all else was equal. Aluminim is lighter (faster) and cast iron is more corosion resistant. Power? ...same.
Rage is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jackhammer
General Q & A
14
06-12-2007 08:24 AM
1BIGJIM
General Q & A
15
03-16-2006 12:33 PM
danielthelen
General Q & A
5
05-09-2005 02:44 PM
HARRISONMIRAGE
General Q & A
1
12-13-2003 07:17 PM
WETTE VETTE
General Q & A
12
05-31-2003 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Compression ratio difference w/ aluminum Heads???


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.