Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Gaffrig or EMI Flame Arrestor? >

Gaffrig or EMI Flame Arrestor?

Notices

Gaffrig or EMI Flame Arrestor?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-14-2002, 09:35 PM
  #1  
Luxy60
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Gaffrig or EMI Flame Arrestor?

I'm considering a flame arrestor to replace the stock unit on my 454Mag EFI. Looking seriously at the Gaffrig or EMI versions (screen vs. cloth/ paper element). Looking for any feedback on either of these models. Also considered the Vortec but I'm not sold on the KN type filter, seems like it would be a pain in the butt to clean/ oil. How long can you typically go between cleanings on these filters?
 
Old 03-15-2002, 08:15 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
jdnca1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have K&N's on my TR setup with xtreme tops. Clean/re-oil once a year, and thats probably too much!
jdnca1 is offline  
Old 03-15-2002, 11:26 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Knoxville,TN, USA
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Gaffrig or EMI Flame Arrestor

I would like to hear any pro's / cons on the use of aftermarket EFI Flame arrestors. Most manufacturers state substantial increase in airflow with their respective pieces. Do any third party, documented tests exist that can substantiate any manufacturers claims ? I can't see gaining any realistic horsepower switching from Merc to aftermarket EFI flame arrestors. At the price the aftermarket pieces sell for, they should work great. I've also read of some difficulties in installation of some manufacturers types on some applications.

K&N makes great stuff. I use their filters on my dually and two autos. I use them for the improved filtering and longer life, not looks. And they are not too expensive. It would be hard to go wrong with K&N on pretty much anything.

My guess is that many people will buy aftermarket flame arrestors just for the custom, non stock look. Kind of like adding chrome valve covers and breather to a tired old 265 Chevy. Not that I wouldn't do it myself. I kind of like the look of the aftermarket stuff too. But, does it make any power ?
deboatmon is offline  
Old 03-15-2002, 01:10 PM
  #4  
Luxy60
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I believe that the aftermarket flame arrestors do provide more and improved airflow vs. the stock unit from Merc. How much depends on who you talk to. I've heard anywhere from 35 - 100%! Same for HP gains. I seen advertisements in the 5 -15 hp range. Which in itself is not going to result in much of a MPH increase (maybe 1 -2 mph, if your engine can take advantage of the extra air). I like the look of an aftermarket units (EMI, Vortech etc.) and from reading others feedback it does seem like they help reduce transom soot with the EFI motors. Reason enough for me to add one. The KN type filter will provide better filtration than the mesh just seems like it would be a pain to maintain??
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LakeLiquor
General Boating Discussion
1
05-01-2008 08:14 PM
C_Spray
General Boating Discussion
8
03-28-2008 07:31 AM
tomlesli
General Boating Discussion
2
07-03-2007 01:39 AM
tpmarine.com
New Products and Member Discounts
0
07-20-2005 12:04 PM
treatcg
General Q & A
15
02-03-2003 08:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Gaffrig or EMI Flame Arrestor?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.