RPM Difference
#11
Not going to change the ratio, trying to figure out whats going on. Suppose to have 1.50 drives boat, but only turning less than 4000 rpms. This boat should be turning 5000-5200 rpms with a 30" prop. Dealer changed lower units on Bravo drives so the serial number will not match up with ratio.
Maybe the foot has differamt gears than your old one?
do what daredevil says
__________________
.
The Only Time You Have To Much Ammo Is When Your Swimming Or On Fire.
.
The Only Time You Have To Much Ammo Is When Your Swimming Or On Fire.
#12
Stevesxm, Your right the boat is a 2006 42 Ex with 525's, My last boat was a 2005 42 Ex with 525's. The reason I'm asking this question is because the 2005 would run 30' props to 5000-5200 rpms. The 2006 will not go past 4000 rpms. I know the dealer switched the lower ends on the Bravo's with another boat and I'm hoping they did not put 1.36 on by mistake.
The 30" props that are on the boat are the ones they issued with the boat at time of purchase. I'm just thinking that the drive ratio's are incorrect,because my 2005 Ex would turn 30" props 5000 rpms all day long.
The 30" props that are on the boat are the ones they issued with the boat at time of purchase. I'm just thinking that the drive ratio's are incorrect,because my 2005 Ex would turn 30" props 5000 rpms all day long.
#18
Mistakes can always be fixed. Just takes $$$$
Would you like to borrow a pair of 26 pitch Bravo's to see how they run? I won't be in the water for another week or two.

Would you like to borrow a pair of 26 pitch Bravo's to see how they run? I won't be in the water for another week or two.
Last edited by PatriYacht; 05-12-2009 at 11:53 AM.
#19
Registered
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
From: sint maarten
now a 28 is roughly 6 % less prop which would require only 6 % more revs for a "break even" or roughly 4250 ... lets say it actually does that... but what he really needs is 25 % more revs so that would imply an impossibly small prop... and no top speed at all....
now.. i understand that this whole thing is not precisely linear like it is w/ tires but it is substanatially so.... and you have the added unassailable fact that this combination worked flawlessly in what are essentially identical circumstances on the first boat...
i think something else is fundementally wrong. this seems like way too much " problem" for an incremental prop change...
i don't have any meaningful suggestion or solution but it just doesn't add up for me somehow.
#20
Your right, not trying to fix the problem with the props. The drive train is the first place to start. The boat is in the shop as we speak and one way or another they will find out is going on.
Maybe it's something in the engine managment system that's not letting the engines come up to full RPM'S.
Maybe it's something in the engine managment system that's not letting the engines come up to full RPM'S.




