Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
push rod length questions >

push rod length questions

Notices

push rod length questions

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-28-2009, 10:18 PM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sumner Ia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I pulled off the valve covers to rejust valves, doing some measuring, and checking things over. As far as the valve stem and the witness marks from the roller rockers the circular pattern seems to be pretty close to the center of the valve stem, which I think is a good thing. Now as far as the lift of the intake valves I am supposed to have .54226 lift with the 1.7 rocker ratio. I very carefully tightened up the adjuster nut until the lifter was actually bottomed out so it was just to the point to were the rocker was going to start opening the actually valve, I did this so I wouldn't have any oil bleed off in the lifters. I then put the travel indicator on the valve spring retainer and rolled the motor over by hand to see what I actually have for lift. Now I am using 1.72 roller rockers so the lift should be a little higher then the .54226 and the indicator actually read .5483. I did this on 4 different intake valves and got the same reading within .0003. So to answer my own question longer push rods will not change the amount of lift you have. So now by running push rods that are just under .100 long will that change the geometry of the valve train and or effect the performance of the engine?

The reason I am doing this is because the boat does not have any top end, it seems to be pretty flat from 2/3's throttle to wide open throttle. My boat would run right at 67 mph with the old engine with two cam lobes starting to go flat and the compression being 90, 90, 110,110, 120 120, 110, and 120. The engine had 504 hours on it. Now with the new engine and the camshaft change and the ecu reprogrammed the motor was designed to be at 485 to 490 hp and the boat doesn't run any faster at all. When we put the scanner on the motor the knock sensor was retarding the timing .982 degs at 3000 rpm. We readjusted the valves and that seems to take a lot of the problem away, but it is still retarding the timing .34 degs at 3000rpm. When we unplugged the sensor the scanner was picking up any timing retardation! Could the longer push rods be causing a little noise or a knock in the engine and the sensor is picking it up?!?! I am at a lose here, this motor should run better then this and I am running out of things to change or try. The only other thing I am wondering about is the fuel pressures could I be running a little low on fuel pressure causing the engine to ping and the sensor picking that up? I did change the filter and there was no change to the way the engine run.

Just so you all know the timing was set at 8 degs in the service mode too.

Please help
Profiler27' is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 08:36 AM
  #12  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

It depends...have you changed the prop??? What RPM is peak tq/HP? How much more HP did you make?

Just because this engine makes more HP doesn't mean it will go faster with the same prop. How much more torque did you make and where does the torque peak compared to the old engine? You may actually have to go down in pitch on the prop to get the RPMS up to where you're making peak HP and the might run faster.

Not saying this is the answer but I've seen it happen.

Lastly, what is your timing advancing to @ full advance? How was the ECU mapped?

Last edited by Panther; 07-29-2009 at 08:43 AM.
Panther is offline  
Old 08-02-2009, 06:54 PM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sumner Ia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I started off using the same prop I used with the last motor and could only spin it 4600rpm which is the same rpm the old motor would turn it. I am supposed to be making 485 to 490 hp with new motor and the old new was 415 in good running condition and the motor had over 500 hrs on it. As far as torque goes I can not answer where the peak torque is at as far as rpm wise. Mark at Precision Marine did the ECU for the cam I am using, I could call and get that info. Logic is telling me if I am making more hp with the new motor and by stay with the same prop I ran with the old motor I am going to be able to turn that prop more rpm and more then likely have to go with a higher pitch prop. The motor just seems to be laying down on the big end for some reason and need to figure out way it is doing that.
Profiler27' is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 07:50 PM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sumner Ia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

think I found the problem. I am supposed to be holding 40 lbs of fuel pressure and at half throttle the pressure is at 35 and at full throttle the pressure falls below 30lbs! Now what pump do I change or do I first remove the check valve in the tank and see if there is a restriction! I was told the fuel system on the motor from factory will support up to 650 hp so I don't feel I need a high volume pump or do I?!

Thanks
Profiler27' is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.