Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
496 Raw water cooling? >

496 Raw water cooling?

Notices

496 Raw water cooling?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-05-2009 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,895
Likes: 124
From: Chicago, IL; Onekama, MI
Default 496 Raw water cooling?

Is it possible to run a GEN VII 496 as a raw water cooled engine? I'm building one that will never see saltwater and it would be nice to set it up this way. All the 496's I've seen all use a heat exchanger.
endeavour32 is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-2009 | 08:01 AM
  #2  
Nordicflame's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 4
From: Layton, Utah
Default

Some of the Volvo 496s are raw water cooled so I would say yes.
Nordicflame is offline  
Reply
Old 08-06-2009 | 04:09 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 1
From: Darwin, Australia
Default

Gen VII 496? That's the full MPEFI, fully computer (ECU) controlled engine isn't it?

The computer won't like the temperature variation, it will forever be chasing mixture rich / lean readings and amending your timing and base map on the fly. Running the closed system allows the engine to reach and maintain operating temp without fluctuation which in turn allows the computer to sit back, relax and run the engine with less to think about.

Sounds silly I bet, but modern ECU's run an open loop system into which temp feedback is usually a primary source of how the ECU chooses to run your motor for you.

My vote? Much as I don't like them, run the closed system. Or if you go carb'd you can do what you want and it'll go great!
Ghostrider is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-2009 | 06:53 AM
  #4  
Rage's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default

You could go with the Volvo ECU that is programed for the open cooling.
Rage is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-2009 | 07:38 AM
  #5  
Nordicflame's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 4
From: Layton, Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Ghostrider
Gen VII 496? That's the full MPEFI, fully computer (ECU) controlled engine isn't it?

The computer won't like the temperature variation, it will forever be chasing mixture rich / lean readings and amending your timing and base map on the fly. Running the closed system allows the engine to reach and maintain operating temp without fluctuation which in turn allows the computer to sit back, relax and run the engine with less to think about.
A raw water system would still have a thermostat and controlled temps like the Volvo.
Not sure I see the correlation here as the ECU would still see maintained/controlled temps just as all the pre closed cooled systems.
Dave
Nordicflame is offline  
Reply
Old 08-11-2009 | 08:11 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
From: sint maarten
Default

Originally Posted by Nordicflame
A raw water system would still have a thermostat and controlled temps like the Volvo.
Not sure I see the correlation here as the ECU would still see maintained/controlled temps just as all the pre closed cooled systems.
Dave

correct. no difference at all between the two if configured properly.
stevesxm is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.