Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
anyone recognize this header >

anyone recognize this header

Notices

anyone recognize this header

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-31-2010 | 08:29 PM
  #11  
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by rssteiny
So then why does everyone want headers over gills.
Mostly for bling. There is some more HP at 5500-6000 RPM but mostly with a more agressive valve train. Either the Gil or the CMI's will provided added HP if run dry. No matter what you do, you are not likely going to gain more than 2 MPH...maybe nothing.
If bling is not a goal, I would sell them.
We used to be able make 500+ HP running dry Gil's with 3.5" ID X 4.0 OD tails. You would also need to do work on the CMI tails to get then to fit your transom cutouts and then you will likely need new transom trim rings if tails have different OD. You will also need the CMI water manifolds and new hoses. It is likely the installation cost will exceed the CMI's initial cost.

With all this, they better look good!
BenPerfected is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:34 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rssteiny
So then why does everyone want headers over gills.
Easyer to change the plugs !
Jeff P31 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:07 PM
  #13  
Smitty's Avatar
VIP Member
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 0
From: Chicago il
Default

Gils and similar manifold type headers usually had risers that leaked after a while. You don't get that with headers, hence the reason more people use them.
__________________
Want your ECU tuned right?? Call Mark at Precision www.pmefi.com
Smitty is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2010 | 12:20 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 11
From: San Diego, California
Wink What is really a "Header"?

I keep trying to explain to performance boaters what the term "Headers" really means. I do not consider E-Tops real headers, they are really short tube tubular exhaust manifolds.
True headers really should have longer 16- 20" tubes as close to equal length as possible with a true merge collector where this actual header can scavange the exhaust from the engine and provide increased air flow and volumetric efficiency to the engine, not just look kinda like a header that replaces a good exhaust manifold which inside is essentially the same as the E-top. Got It! good, now go buy yourself a real header or keep the Gils you've got!

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2010 | 07:46 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 1
From: pa
Default

Thanks Guys, think ill pass on them and stay with the gills.
rssteiny is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2010 | 09:22 AM
  #16  
jrz
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Menasha,WI
Default

The primary lenght for the E-Top is 15.5", within about .25". If there is no power increase over the manifolds, why was there a weight penalty in APBA production classes when the Gills were replaced by the CMI's on HP500 carb engines?
jrz is offline  
Reply
Old 04-01-2010 | 10:29 AM
  #17  
formula377's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Default

Seems to me that since the Gils all flow together early in the manifold there is more chance of reversion than on a CMI etop. It was my understanding this was the reasoin Mercruiser went to the CMI's.
formula377 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.