Balancing pistons? How much is too much?
#12
Thread Starter
I hate the winter!!
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,707
Likes: 0
From: long island, new york
Bill,
This engine runs 6100 rpm at WOT. I was also thinking that 7 grams is alot of material to remove on a mill. I was going to experiment with an old damaged piston by removing material until the piston got 7 grams lighter. Then see how much material was covering the floor!
As always, thanks for the advice.
This engine runs 6100 rpm at WOT. I was also thinking that 7 grams is alot of material to remove on a mill. I was going to experiment with an old damaged piston by removing material until the piston got 7 grams lighter. Then see how much material was covering the floor!
As always, thanks for the advice.
#13
My head is spinning now. Please correct me if I'm way off base here but it's my understanding that so long as all the pistons are within .5gms of each other and the rods and bins are balanced to the same tolerances is the crankshaft really going to be balanced any differently for an additional 7gms of weight? I understood it to be mismatched weights that would cause a problem with harmonics not a different total weight. So long as the pin placement, use the same rods and ring set up what would be the problem?
#15
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,480
Likes: 43
From: Tennessee
I can't see where you would have any trouble with it. 7 grams isn't that much, plus it puts you in an overbalance. I don't, but I have heard of several guys that will intentionally overbalance an engine. Some as much as 5-10 grams. Like others, I shoot for less than 1 gram. I understand what you are trying to do and would just go with it. You will not notice the slight overbalance.
Eddie
Eddie
#16
I think we agree the weight “should” not be a big deal, but if we’re wrong, who pays for the damage? This is Vinny’s dilemma.
#17
Registered
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 2
From: Grosse Pointe Farms, MI
FBP - that's exactly what I was thinking. I really don't think that adding 7gs across the board will throw it out of balance.
What you could do is build the motor the way it is, throw it on the balancing machine and see if it needs any weight added or removed... That should tell you something, and may be worth the piece of mind.
#18
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il

I can't see where you would have any trouble with it. 7 grams isn't that much, plus it puts you in an overbalance. I don't, but I have heard of several guys that will intentionally overbalance an engine. Some as much as 5-10 grams. Like others, I shoot for less than 1 gram. I understand what you are trying to do and would just go with it. You will not notice the slight overbalance.
Eddie
Eddie
#19
Vinnie,
The first measure would to be obtaining a copy of your balance sheet to verify the original bobweight. At that point you can determine if the original balance was 50%, or if the shop overbalanced the assembly. An overbalance condition, up to ~4% is acceptable (possibly desirable). However, in your case, when adding weight to the piston side it puts you into/toward and under balance condition, which most builders try to avoid in the majority of situations.
Many shops will intentionally overbalance to accommodate a future overbore and the resulting marginally heavier piston. If your original balance was to ~52%, for example, your +7 gm piston gain would bring your assembly closer to underbalanced/neutral condition while still remaining on the OB side. If your original balance was @ 50%, or marginally less, (neutral or underbalanced) the +7gm gain might bring you further into an underbalanced condition which you may choose to avoid. Your build sheet data will assist you in that decision.
Bob
The first measure would to be obtaining a copy of your balance sheet to verify the original bobweight. At that point you can determine if the original balance was 50%, or if the shop overbalanced the assembly. An overbalance condition, up to ~4% is acceptable (possibly desirable). However, in your case, when adding weight to the piston side it puts you into/toward and under balance condition, which most builders try to avoid in the majority of situations.
Many shops will intentionally overbalance to accommodate a future overbore and the resulting marginally heavier piston. If your original balance was to ~52%, for example, your +7 gm piston gain would bring your assembly closer to underbalanced/neutral condition while still remaining on the OB side. If your original balance was @ 50%, or marginally less, (neutral or underbalanced) the +7gm gain might bring you further into an underbalanced condition which you may choose to avoid. Your build sheet data will assist you in that decision.
Bob
Last edited by rmbuilder; 10-25-2010 at 01:00 PM.
#20
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 251
From: Waldorf, Md
My head is spinning now. Please correct me if I'm way off base here but it's my understanding that so long as all the pistons are within .5gms of each other and the rods and bins are balanced to the same tolerances is the crankshaft really going to be balanced any differently for an additional 7gms of weight? I understood it to be mismatched weights that would cause a problem with harmonics not a different total weight. So long as the pin placement, use the same rods and ring set up what would be the problem?
This is kind of basic but, when a crankshaft is balanced, it is made to match the weights of the parts that are attached to it. Most of the time, new performance parts are lighter, so you have to remove weight from the crankshaft counterweights to compensate. In this case the new parts are heavier so to really balance the crankshaft exactly, you would have to put weight back into the counterweights.
Making all of the parts the same weights is a very important step in the balancing procedure, but the most important part is balancing the crankshaft to match those weights.
Hope this helps,
Bill Koustenis
Advanced Automotive Machine
Waldorf Md


