![]() |
Originally Posted by baja208
(Post 3352131)
Thanks Bob for the technical analysis of port size. I was hoping you would post some info on what cam specs would also work best in this applicaton. The Brodix 3X Ovals are a good flowing head for the money.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5295/...b9ee720860.jpg [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522363575/] http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5180/...907c7ae7f1.jpg [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522953946/] http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5137/...24bb261f8e.jpg [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522953676/] http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5212/...6d20c4ab83.jpg [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522363737/] Sweeeeeeeeeeet .....them Babies look dayum good , may have to leave them on the coffee table right next to the Grey G@@se :drink: |
Originally Posted by Philm
(Post 3309908)
That should make some good power. Hopefully you are going Hydraulic. the reduction in maintenance isnt huge, but in the long run they are much easier on the valve train as a whole.
The solid cam that I have is a .697/.697 262/272 @ 50 with a 112LSA. It also has the 7/4 swap. It made 800hp at 6300rpm in a 598ci. |
Have new 365 xtra O's and looking to sell or trade for smaller intakes.
Originally Posted by baja208
(Post 3318457)
The 332 cc 3xO is not that small. The pour cc might seem small but the 2.300 intake valve and flow numbers suggest otherwise. In this rpm range should work well. I'm interested to hear what RM builder had to say.
Wanna trade? They make better cfm,s then the CNC ported heads. Steve |
I`m sure he`d like to trade... 5 years later
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.