604 CI Build sheet

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

03-16-2011 | 10:03 PM

#71

RunninHotRacing163.1

Banned

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 12,849

Likes: 3

From: Frankfort,ill

Quote:

Originally Posted by baja208

Thanks Bob for the technical analysis of port size. I was hoping you would post some info on what cam specs would also work best in this applicaton. The Brodix 3X Ovals are a good flowing head for the money.

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522363575/]

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522953946/]

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522953676/]

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/57477430@N04/5522363737/]

Sweeeeeeeeeeet .....them Babies look dayum good , may have to leave them on the coffee table right next to the Grey G@@se

03-28-2011 | 02:34 PM

#72

RunninHotRacing163.1

Banned

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 12,849

Likes: 3

From: Frankfort,ill

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philm

That should make some good power. Hopefully you are going Hydraulic. the reduction in maintenance isnt huge, but in the long run they are much easier on the valve train as a whole.

The solid cam that I have is a .697/.697 262/272 @ 50 with a 112LSA. It also has the 7/4 swap. It made 800hp at 6300rpm in a 598ci.

BTW you better save up for some new ROD BOLTS

(cause your gettin em )

02-13-2016 | 03:49 AM

#73

stevesolo16

Registered

Joined: Feb 2016

Posts: 3

Likes: 0

Have new 365 xtra O's and looking to sell or trade for smaller intakes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by baja208

The 332 cc 3xO is not that small. The pour cc might seem small but the 2.300 intake valve and flow numbers suggest otherwise. In this rpm range should work well. I'm interested to hear what RM builder had to say.

I have a set of new 365 extra O's professionally ported and looking for smaller/less cc intake runners.
Wanna trade?
They make better cfm,s then the CNC ported heads.
Steve

Last edited by stevesolo16; 02-13-2016 at 04:05 AM.