Formula 242 vs 252
#1
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
I'm looking at either the Formula 242 or 252 with either the 454MAG or 7.4MPI respectively. Are these built on the same hull? What type of performance differences should I expect?
There is one 1989 242SS with a 540 cubic in 600 hp motor. Can the boat handle it?
Thanks
There is one 1989 242SS with a 540 cubic in 600 hp motor. Can the boat handle it?
Thanks
#3
I had a 252 and loved it. Very solid boat.
I saw one at a poker run with an 850 in it, and that thing would fly, almost literally. It was over powered and looked pretty squirrely when running flat out.
I saw one at a poker run with an 850 in it, and that thing would fly, almost literally. It was over powered and looked pretty squirrely when running flat out.
#4
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Can't argue that. The 252 replaced the 242 and you can never tell what they include in boat length designation. One year it includes the swimplatform the next is doesn't. Im more interested if the basic hull design changed.
#5
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Thanks for the reply. How was your 252 powered and propped? What kind of cruise speed / rpm and wot were you seeing?
#6
Registered
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 3
From: Tonawanda NY
I'm looking at either the Formula 242 or 252 with either the 454MAG or 7.4MPI respectively. Are these built on the same hull? What type of performance differences should I expect?
There is one 1989 242SS with a 540 cubic in 600 hp motor. Can the boat handle it?
Thanks
There is one 1989 242SS with a 540 cubic in 600 hp motor. Can the boat handle it?
Thanks
you want the 242, its actually bigger, it does not include the platform, tip to tip it measures 26.02 or close to that, its layed out better, more resale it will always be a desired model, where the 252 is not, and the in my opinion the 252 was made cheaplly in areas, if your gonna compare anything compare a early model 271 to the 242, I've had both there very similar 242 has things i wish my 271 did and my 271 has things i wish the 242 had. a 242 with a 365hp runs 58/59
#7
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
you want the 242, its actually bigger, it does not include the platform, tip to tip it measures 26.02 or close to that, its layed out better, more resale it will always be a desired model, where the 252 is not, and the in my opinion the 252 was made cheaplly in areas, if your gonna compare anything compare a early model 271 to the 242, I've had both there very similar 242 has things i wish my 271 did and my 271 has things i wish the 242 had. a 242 with a 365hp runs 58/59
Thanks again
Gene
#8
Registered
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 3
From: Tonawanda NY
Many thanks. I was wondering why the older 242, in many cases, was as expensive as the newer 252. That explains it. The only down side to the 242 I am looking at is it is the SS model. So no bolster seat on the port side. But I guess that is a straightforward retrofit.
Thanks again
Gene
Thanks again
Gene
#10
Registered
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 3
From: Tonawanda NY
bolsters
http://www.boattrader.com/listing/19...LA-LS-97149950
no bolsters but very sharp!!
http://www.boattrader.com/listing/19...42-LS-98194157
http://www.boattrader.com/listing/19...LA-LS-97149950
no bolsters but very sharp!!
http://www.boattrader.com/listing/19...42-LS-98194157



