Goto 540 or Tweek out the 489
#22
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
#23
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 20
From: Millstadt, IL
I just read about a thousand post on failed Marine Kinetics cams. Now I am nervous. I did not have a catastrophic failure before my rebuild and it did hold up for several years. But I did have a ton of valve leakage on the leak down test before rebuild. I had 8 rocker arms that needed rebuilt. Not sure if they were exhaust or intake. I was burning at least a quart of oil per day trip at the end. I am now getting regular oil analysis and this should give me a heads up. I had at 4 of them done last year and it was better after I added the oil thermostat. Any advise?
#24
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,140
Likes: 3,707
From: On A Dirt Floor
More round table talk….
Another note: if you are truly at 10.3:1, the cam you have is too short in duration. The cam you have was trying to achieve more cylinder pressure , which you don’t need nor want now.
Note#2: You where reving 5500rpm. My guess is that was just passed max power. 224 is a tow truck cam for near 500cid.
Somewhere 236-240 at .050” intake duration is where your motor will want to eat. Prob 240
You have an exhaust to handle it?
Another note: if you are truly at 10.3:1, the cam you have is too short in duration. The cam you have was trying to achieve more cylinder pressure , which you don’t need nor want now.
Note#2: You where reving 5500rpm. My guess is that was just passed max power. 224 is a tow truck cam for near 500cid.
Somewhere 236-240 at .050” intake duration is where your motor will want to eat. Prob 240

You have an exhaust to handle it?
#27
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 20
From: Millstadt, IL
More round table talk….
Another note: if you are truly at 10.3:1, the cam you have is too short in duration. The cam you have was trying to achieve more cylinder pressure , which you don’t need nor want now.
Note#2: You where reving 5500rpm. My guess is that was just passed max power. 224 is a tow truck cam for near 500cid.
Somewhere 236-240 at .050” intake duration is where your motor will want to eat. Prob 240
You have an exhaust to handle it?
Another note: if you are truly at 10.3:1, the cam you have is too short in duration. The cam you have was trying to achieve more cylinder pressure , which you don’t need nor want now.
Note#2: You where reving 5500rpm. My guess is that was just passed max power. 224 is a tow truck cam for near 500cid.
Somewhere 236-240 at .050” intake duration is where your motor will want to eat. Prob 240

You have an exhaust to handle it?
Last edited by jeffswav; 05-03-2022 at 10:11 AM.
#28
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,899
Likes: 20
From: Millstadt, IL
#30
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Anyone have experience with this cam?
https://www.cpperformance.com/p-1675...-camshaft.aspx
https://www.cpperformance.com/p-1675...-camshaft.aspx
This would be a little easier on VT
623 hp at 6k on my 496’s - same duration!


