Notices

454 vs 502

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-11-2012 | 05:38 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: St Amant La
Default

502....
MrSneakAttack is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2012 | 06:30 PM
  #12  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

I'd actually like to see the hp500(502) vs the hp450(454) in a dyno comparison.

I myself, probably would not let this debate decide on which engine will last longer. If you are building from scratch, then yes, go for the 502.

Ive known marine 454's of all different hp variations, to last from 500 hours to 2000 hours. Its all in maintainance and conditions they were used. Like stated, they both use a 4" stroke and 6.135 Rod. They are very similar from a design standpoint.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2012 | 09:05 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,825
Likes: 612
From: Clarkston, Michigan
Default

502
thirdchildhood is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-2012 | 12:51 PM
  #14  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 416
Likes: 13
From: Birch Run, MI
Default

48 more cubic inches means close to 48 more lb ft of torque. Since they both weigh the same it doesnt make sense to have less torque and 30 less horsepower in the same package now does it?
rexcramer1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-2012 | 01:19 PM
  #15  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default

The bigger bore is the best benefit of the 502.
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-2012 | 01:21 PM
  #16  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Pismo10
The bigger bore is the best benefit of the 502.
I agree. The bigger bore helps unshroud the valves, which means more airflow/hp.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 01-13-2012 | 07:12 PM
  #17  
mcollinstn's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,769
Likes: 150
From: tn
Default

Originally Posted by JasonSmith
It is no secret that the 454 MAG MPI more often than not made as much power as the 502 MAG MPI. They share the same camshaft, injectors, valve train.....
I call B.S.

Given identical builds and compression ratios, the only way the 454 mag would ever make similar power than the 502 mag is if the intake being used was physically maxed out on flow with the 454, and even then the 502 would still have noticeably more torque and acceleration.

The cubic inch difference in the two motors is not the only reason the 502 makes more power, the other reason is that the bore is larger, thus unshrouding the flow from the valves where the 454's smaller bore requires bore notching to deliver equivalent results.

For the life of me, I can't think of a single situation where the stock block 454 would be the preferable choice over the stock block 502 unless you were running more than 20 lbs of boost and wanted the additional cylinder wall thickness to aid in stability of the block (but then we're still talking about if you were using a thickwall 454 block, not a thinwall passenger car block).

Rotating mass in the 502/454 comparison is a complete NON ISSUE in the sub-5,000 rpm world of 500 horsepower marine engines. The forged components used in the mags are plenty beefy that the only way you'll have excessive bottom end wear in either one is if you have a serious oiling malfunction.

MC
mcollinstn is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.