Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
TRS vs BRAVO >

TRS vs BRAVO

Notices

TRS vs BRAVO

Old 01-29-2012 | 05:35 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 1
From: Denmark and hopefully some place nice
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Hmmm....I did not realize. I actually DIDN'T buy a really, really nice fountiain 10 meter a few years back just because of the TRS set up.

The broker on the boat told me that the power in it (about 500 a side) was to much for those drives.
The TRS drive is stronger than the B1's, but yes, they also have their limit, they are heavy, take hp to spin ect. 500+hp is pushing it with a TRS, but a sure time bomb with a Bravo, even if they come with the 525EFI and 600SCI. Now a days it gets worse with the Bravo gears being junk. Bravo drives suck, in any shape or form.
A.O. Razor is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 05:46 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 7
From: Sandown, NH - Sebago Lake Region, ME
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Hmmm....I did not realize. I actually DIDN'T buy a really, really nice fountiain 10 meter a few years back just because of the TRS set up.

The broker on the boat told me that the power in it (about 500 a side) was to much for those drives.
Got 565hp a side in mine hooked up to TRS's and no problems. Love the way the tranny's shifts so smooth!! If I ever have to switch it will be to a Konrad!!
502ss is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 07:00 PM
  #13  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 1,522
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

I have had 600HP per side for the last 3 years in front of my TRS with no problems. I had a friend with 700HP+ on a 86 Top Gun and would go through 1 sometimes 2 drive a year.

Only time I had a problem with my TRS is when I blew an upper cause I only put 1.5qts of oil during my first drive oil change. I know it takes 3qts now.
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 09:34 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Lake Ozark, MO
Default

Originally Posted by Plowtownmissile
Just curious... You didn't happen to buy your boat up by Chicago did you?



I agree 100%
No I bought it here Lake of the Ozarks
BadBoy is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 09:39 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 160
From: central IL
Default

Originally Posted by BadBoy
No I bought it here Lake of the Ozarks
Ok cool. There was a '79 300 with 454/TRS near Chicago with porno red interior for sale for a long time that had been full of water.
Plowtownmissile is offline  
Reply
Old 01-29-2012 | 11:12 PM
  #16  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

I would not waste the time to change from a trs to a bravo. It would require a ton of work, for a drive not as strong. My friend ran 700hp 540s in a 79 scarab 300 with trs. 90mph boat and no drive problems. He also ran it like he stole it and in rough water.

It sounds like your talking to a lot of guys who are giving you bad info about trs drives. As for trannies going bad, and having to pull the engine, etc...true. But what about blowing a bravo coupler?? Having a merc trans or velvet drive rebuilt isn't much more than a coupler job. Plus the trannies shift soo much smoother.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 07:08 AM
  #17  
Rookie's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,020
Likes: 1,522
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Most everyone I have talked to on the subject says TRS are not good over 400hp...??? Is this not correct?
The limiting factor might be the Merc trans on some setups. I know the stock Merc trans will take less HP than the TRS. The BW velvets can take more power. When I had my BW's upgraded I had the 7 Kevlar plates installed and now should be good to 750HP.
Rookie is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 07:27 AM
  #18  
cigrocket's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 173
From: Endicott, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie
The limiting factor might be the Merc trans on some setups. I know the stock Merc trans will take less HP than the TRS. The BW velvets can take more power. When I had my BW's upgraded I had the 7 Kevlar plates installed and now should be good to 750HP.
True, I had my BW 71C's built to Huber 925 specs when I owned the boat. It wasn't that much to upgrade the trannies.
cigrocket is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 01:16 PM
  #19  
AIR TIME's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,283
Likes: 1
From: EASTON MA.
Default

Originally Posted by Baja226sport
Most everyone I have talked to on the subject says TRS are not good over 400hp...??? Is this not correct?

Just wondering.
I got friends that ran up to 700hp with trs drives, b1 is450hp drive, but I put 585hp/600/650 hp on a single b1 on my 24ol for 12 years or so.if you have trs and hp above 600hp going with a konrad is the way to go. there rated at 800hp, my motor is more than that on the saber.konrad is shorter than a trs better bulit so its faster.
AIR TIME is offline  
Reply
Old 01-30-2012 | 05:42 PM
  #20  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default

Wait until it blows up and then switch to bravo..
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.