Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
7.4 mpi vs the "replacement" 383? >

7.4 mpi vs the "replacement" 383?

Notices

7.4 mpi vs the "replacement" 383?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-19-2012, 08:51 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 7.4 mpi vs the "replacement" 383?

In a 23.5 ft bowrider, 12 years old. Only 200 hours on the 7.4.
If you HAD to, would you find a long block 7.4 to put in where the old one was, or this mercruiser 383 replacement?
http://www.perfprotech.com/store/pro...R80,66327.aspx

I may not have a choice in the matter, as I did not winterize the 7.4. (someone else did)



But, if it were your boat, would you kick in the extra cash to get a new rebuilt mercruiser, or find a rebuilt longblock 7.4, and switch all the accessories over?

We do a bit of tubing, some water skiing, etc. Prety sure I would get better economy out of the mouse motor, but wondering if I would miss the torque?

There is this article which makes a pretty compelling argument for the mouse:
http://www.stingrayboats.com/product...ws/tb2_99.html

We frequently have 9 or 10 souls on board. (boat rated for 12)

Last edited by Fast Algae; 05-19-2012 at 08:55 PM.
Fast Algae is offline  
Old 05-19-2012, 09:24 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,165
Received 110 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

The quickest (shortest turn around time) solution is the plug and play 383.

However,..

I would look into how big of a motor you could build in a big block for the $9k you'd spend on the crate motor. The advantage being all the accessories already in hand. With a 23.5' boat in the long run a big block would be the way to go.
Trash is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 06:38 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: westville, NJ
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

first, where do you live. this winter was pretty mild on the east coast. second, you can find an article on the internet that will defend any position and make it sound reasonable and sensible. for $9k i am sure you can find a plug-play 454. you can find all kinds of good used for a lot less. especially here... and yes, you would miss the torque.
dereknkathy is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 07:07 AM
  #4  
coolrunning racing
VIP Member
 
mrv8outboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: cape cod
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I did a Sea Ray that had a 7.4 Bravo I. I installed the 357 and not the 383 and only lost 400 RPM. The customer states that no other noticeable difference. The 383 would be a nice replacement.
mrv8outboard is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dereknkathy
first, where do you live. this winter was pretty mild on the east coast. second, you can find an article on the internet that will defend any position and make it sound reasonable and sensible. for $9k i am sure you can find a plug-play 454. you can find all kinds of good used for a lot less. especially here... and yes, you would miss the torque.
While mild, we still got sub zero for a while.. Enough to cause heartache.

Upstate NY. The 7.4 only a little over 200 hours on it. It (and the boat) were kept mint. I am a little leary of a used one. I have a friend with the exact same engine in a 28' sunsation, and he desperately would love to upgrade to something with more power. He has two power settings on that thing, one is idle. So I would be thinking a used one would come from a similar environment/ reason.
In the end (unless I start *****ing, and I really don't want to have to) my hands are tied, the shop will do what they think it takes to make it right. I want to go into it as educated as possible though.
Fast Algae is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 01:54 PM
  #6  
Registered
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 294
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Find out what all is damaged on the 7.4. No matter what, Start There!
Waveform is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 02:06 PM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm pretty sure my engine is shot. Asking around, no shop has a memory of casting plugs getting ejected and NOT having a cracked block.
I will pleasantly surprised if that is not the case, but I am not holding out much hope. I think somehow the engine did not get winterized, or if it did, it certainly did not get done sufficiently.
Fast Algae is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 02:58 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fox Island, WA
Posts: 557
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I had two friends that both had same brand, near identical 21' deep V powerboats. One was powered by a 350 Mag. The other had a stock 454. 270 H.P. V 330. The 454 boat was 8 m.p.h. faster.

I have twin 6.2s (377cu in) in my current boat. They are nice motors but there is no inexpensive horsepower out there for these motors if you find you've come up a bit short.

I'd be tempted to stay big block (new long block) and add fresh water cooling.
Wes Burmark is offline  
Old 05-20-2012, 03:15 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wes Burmark

I'd be tempted to stay big block (new long block) and add fresh water cooling.
I love that idea. Would make winterization simple and sure.
Fast Algae is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.