Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Small block - vortec or aluminum heads >

Small block - vortec or aluminum heads

Notices

Small block - vortec or aluminum heads

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-24-2013, 07:23 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Small block - vortec or aluminum heads

I have a 355 (.030 over 350) that I built and it's only got a couple dozen hours on it but I've got to pull it out this spring to find a nagging oil leak (that I suspect is the seal retainer in the rear). Since it's got to come out I'm thinking about switching up the combo a little bit.

Right now it's just a basic build that replaced an anemic 2bbl 305. A 94-ish 1-ton truck block that was cleaned, bored .030 and has new cam bearings, freeze plugs, etc. Pistons are flat tops with ~8cc 4-valve reliefs, block wasn't decked so they sit down in the hole a bit (.018-.020 iirc), cam is a comp extreme marine XM270H (270/286 dur, 226/[email protected], .480/.489", 112*lsa). Heads are stock '94 TBI castings that have upgraded exhaust valves and valvesprings.

The engine pulls good to about 52-5300, cam's power range is listed as 1600-5800 but I'm guessing that the heads are bottle-necking it quite a bit so since it's going to be out I've got a couple of heads sitting around - the first is a set of vortec iron heads that have low miles since rebuilt for a pickup - they would need to have work done to fit better springs (or use the drop-in beehives) and I've got some 1.6 roller rockers that fit them (self-aligning) but otherwise should be good to go, and I would need to get a vortec manifold (probably an edelbrock performer RPM?) The next is the top end of an old Holley SysteMAX kit that doesn't have too many miles on it - I'd run it with 1.6 roller rockers and have to get perimiter valvecovers.

From what I've been able to find the vortec's and the old SystemMax heads flow almost the same with the vortec's having a 64cc chamber and the Holley's having a 68cc. Both would put me about 9.6:1 static / 7.6:1 Dynamic compression ratio so it's almost a wash there.

The main reason I'd go the aluminum is to get weight off the rear and pair it with a set of HGE aluminum exhaust manifolds and risers. Is that reason enough to go aluminum heads? I only boat on lakes in the midwest so salt isn't a concern but I also don't want to have to do any real maintenance after pulling the boat out of the water every weekend.

Anyone have any experience with similar combo's and would recommend one over the other?
bwiencek is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 08:28 AM
  #2  
Registered
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tygart Lake, WV
Posts: 1,290
Received 122 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bwiencek
I have a 355 (.030 over 350) that I built and it's only got a couple dozen hours on it but I've got to pull it out this spring to find a nagging oil leak (that I suspect is the seal retainer in the rear). Since it's got to come out I'm thinking about switching up the combo a little bit.

Right now it's just a basic build that replaced an anemic 2bbl 305. A 94-ish 1-ton truck block that was cleaned, bored .030 and has new cam bearings, freeze plugs, etc. Pistons are flat tops with ~8cc 4-valve reliefs, block wasn't decked so they sit down in the hole a bit (.018-.020 iirc), cam is a comp extreme marine XM270H (270/286 dur, 226/[email protected], .480/.489", 112*lsa). Heads are stock '94 TBI castings that have upgraded exhaust valves and valvesprings.

The engine pulls good to about 52-5300, cam's power range is listed as 1600-5800 but I'm guessing that the heads are bottle-necking it quite a bit so since it's going to be out I've got a couple of heads sitting around - the first is a set of vortec iron heads that have low miles since rebuilt for a pickup - they would need to have work done to fit better springs (or use the drop-in beehives) and I've got some 1.6 roller rockers that fit them (self-aligning) but otherwise should be good to go, and I would need to get a vortec manifold (probably an edelbrock performer RPM?) The next is the top end of an old Holley SysteMAX kit that doesn't have too many miles on it - I'd run it with 1.6 roller rockers and have to get perimiter valvecovers.

From what I've been able to find the vortec's and the old SystemMax heads flow almost the same with the vortec's having a 64cc chamber and the Holley's having a 68cc. Both would put me about 9.6:1 static / 7.6:1 Dynamic compression ratio so it's almost a wash there.

The main reason I'd go the aluminum is to get weight off the rear and pair it with a set of HGE aluminum exhaust manifolds and risers. Is that reason enough to go aluminum heads? I only boat on lakes in the midwest so salt isn't a concern but I also don't want to have to do any real maintenance after pulling the boat out of the water every weekend.

Anyone have any experience with similar combo's and would recommend one over the other?
I would go with the Holley aluminum heads over the Iron Vortec.
Flow numbers are close between the two so its a washup there. Aluminum heads, manifolds, intake will make a substantial weight savings and handling difference.

Mill the Holley heads to get you around 10-1 static, valve lap the seats and check the spring pressures. Performer RPM intake and the 1.6 rockers should make for a nice combo.

In freshwater, you should have no problem with aluminum heads. I've been running them for years with no problems on my small blocks.
Ryan00TJ is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 09:08 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ocala, Fl
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bwiencek
I have a 355 (.030 over 350) that I built and it's only got a couple dozen hours on it but I've got to pull it out this spring to find a nagging oil leak (that I suspect is the seal retainer in the rear). Since it's got to come out I'm thinking about switching up the combo a little bit.

Right now it's just a basic build that replaced an anemic 2bbl 305. A 94-ish 1-ton truck block that was cleaned, bored .030 and has new cam bearings, freeze plugs, etc. Pistons are flat tops with ~8cc 4-valve reliefs, block wasn't decked so they sit down in the hole a bit (.018-.020 iirc), cam is a comp extreme marine XM270H (270/286 dur, 226/[email protected], .480/.489", 112*lsa). Heads are stock '94 TBI castings that have upgraded exhaust valves and valvesprings.

The engine pulls good to about 52-5300, cam's power range is listed as 1600-5800 but I'm guessing that the heads are bottle-necking it quite a bit so since it's going to be out I've got a couple of heads sitting around - the first is a set of vortec iron heads that have low miles since rebuilt for a pickup - they would need to have work done to fit better springs (or use the drop-in beehives) and I've got some 1.6 roller rockers that fit them (self-aligning) but otherwise should be good to go, and I would need to get a vortec manifold (probably an edelbrock performer RPM?) The next is the top end of an old Holley SysteMAX kit that doesn't have too many miles on it - I'd run it with 1.6 roller rockers and have to get perimiter valvecovers.

From what I've been able to find the vortec's and the old SystemMax heads flow almost the same with the vortec's having a 64cc chamber and the Holley's having a 68cc. Both would put me about 9.6:1 static / 7.6:1 Dynamic compression ratio so it's almost a wash there.

The main reason I'd go the aluminum is to get weight off the rear and pair it with a set of HGE aluminum exhaust manifolds and risers. Is that reason enough to go aluminum heads? I only boat on lakes in the midwest so salt isn't a concern but I also don't want to have to do any real maintenance after pulling the boat out of the water every weekend.

Anyone have any experience with similar combo's and would recommend one over the other?
I can speak for the Vortecs.I have a similar combo to yours with the Comp Roller Xtreme Marine set up and 1.5 Needle Rockers. mine made 400 HP/435# TQ with Edelbrock Performer Dual plane brass lined intake and a 750 Double Pumper...stock Vortec heads. Dyno exhaust was street headers so figure down from that. Motors (twins) are going in 255 Formula ahead of Bravo I's.

If you shave the heads make sure you remember to shim the distributor the proper amount so it doesn't run too deep into the cam gear.
sprink58 is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 02:31 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think I'd mill either head - the compression ratios would be real safe on premium pump gas, but with the vortec's more efficient burn chamber design can I get it safe to run 87 octane pump gas vs the Holley's traditional wedge design?

What are you guys running for ignition? I've got the stock Thunderbolt IV setup and am hoping it's not holding me back RPM wise on the top end.

The real question is how much weight can I shave off the tail end with aluminum heads and aluminum exhaust manifolds and how much of a difference is speed/acceleration would it make (assuming that the iron headed / exhaust makes exactly the same HP curve)
bwiencek is offline  
Old 01-26-2013, 04:00 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I do not like aluminum heads on boats without closed cooling..even fresh water kills them quicker than most think...vortecs are great heads, you may need to mill down the guides with that cam...some sell them prepped with that done pretty cheap...keep in mind less timing and they take a long reach spark plug...
ezstriper is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.