| Brad Perry |
07-29-2002 05:20 PM |
I'm not trying to rock the boat,
but let me share my experiences with you guys. I too always thought that the stock merc TB module and coil were plenty. I damn well liked the electronic curve rather than going with mechanical (stone age?) advance mechanism. If you want to add a different coil - big deal. It wasn't until this motor that I became sold on the CD ignition (I'm sure other brands are great as well as MSD). I had 2 NA motors with Merc HP modules (straight 20 degree advance) with great performance. Had a blower motor with V6 module that seemed to run fine, if you had clean plugs. My current motor ( a blown 540 running more boost) however just didn't run right and constantly fouled plugs (even at 2500 rpm!). I was really questioning the fresh Nickerson carbs. Several people asked if I had an MSD (or equiv) ignition amplifier (teague and others). I kept thinking that money would be wasted. Finally got fed up and put it on the dyno and saw 30 ft-lbs more torque from the MSD alone (with the fouled plugs). During several pulls where we adjusted timing and valves, the once fouled plugs started to clear up. When I re-installed the engine in the boat and put a set of fresh plugs in, they have stayed clean every since, to me, proving that the carburation was not off, but the mixture was not getting ignited completely.
Maybe this is not as true for NA engines, but take it for what it is worth as far as someones elses experience goes. I really think that it has a lot to do with effective compression ratio. So take the example of a 600hp 540 that has 9:1 compression compared to a blown 8.5:1 (static) 454 with an effective 11:1 ratio. I think that the higher combustion pressures require more spark energy to get proper ignition in the blower case ( and don't hurt in the other case. You can still use the TB module to get your advance curve, using the MSD box as an ignition amplifier.
Good Luck!
|