Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Quick 383 build question >

Quick 383 build question

Notices

Quick 383 build question

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-29-2013, 06:12 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lake Winnebago
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Quick 383 build question

I'm ordering my 383 rotating assemblies in the next few days. They will be all forged internal balanced with 7/16 bolts -12.8 c pistons BUT 5.7 rods or 6" and I beam or h beam rods? I've heard some things about clearance issues.

Thanks for your help in advance.
2330s is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 06:27 PM
  #2  
MarineKinetics
Platinum Member
 
rmbuilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

2330

Rod bolt / cam clearance may be an issue. Be aware of this in considering your connecting rod selection. You also have the option of using a small base circle cam if necessary.

Bob
rmbuilder is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 09:13 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lake Winnebago
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the reply. I have the cams already they are not small base and are flat tappet, I will be looking for some roller cams but its not in the budget now. Wifes on me to get it back on the water. Interior,paint,system,gauges and controls came first. I can swap cams with the motors in the boat. Do the h beam rods need extra clearance in the oil pan area and I think that leaves me with 5.7 rods?
So where am I at with options?
2330s is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 09:31 PM
  #4  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Make sure the rods are for a stroker motor and you should be fine, check clearances before balance and final assembly.
GPM is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 10:23 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,165
Received 110 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I used 6.0 H-beam rods with a stroker crank assembly. Block had to be mildly clearanced around the oil pan rail and the stock Merc windage tray had to be machined slightly. I used a hyd roller cam and did not have to use a small base circle cam. Stock late model 1 pc rear main seal GM 4 bolt block. 6.0 rods increase dwell time at TDC and thus enhance torque while minimizing piston side loads with the increased stroke.
Trash is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 10:40 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,293
Received 286 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

I built a stroker for my Camaro abt 10 years ago.
Had to switch from factory I-beam to H-beam (Eagle stroker) rods to clear my non small base roller cam (Lingenfelter 74211).
I remember having to massage the oil pan a bit to clear but wasn't that big of deal.
zz28zz is offline  
Old 05-30-2013, 06:50 AM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Lake Winnebago
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok thanks for all the info. Two piece rear. The rods are for a stroker and it will be shipped balanced with the bob weight sheet.
2330s is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.