MSD vs. Mallory electronic
#11
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Daytona sensors and a merc oe hall effect dist..the box is pricy but it wont break!!..http://www.daytona-sensors.com/products_ignition.html
#12
I really appreciate all the responses but, can anyone outline the reason to use a capacitive discharge ignition on a marine application?
Trying to determine if I really need a "box" or if I can simplify it with only an electronic breaker less ignition.
Thanks, rob
Trying to determine if I really need a "box" or if I can simplify it with only an electronic breaker less ignition.
Thanks, rob
#13
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I really appreciate all the responses but, can anyone outline the reason to use a capacitive discharge ignition on a marine application?
Trying to determine if I really need a "box" or if I can simplify it with only an electronic breaker less ignition.
Thanks, rob
Trying to determine if I really need a "box" or if I can simplify it with only an electronic breaker less ignition.
Thanks, rob
#14
Registered
iTrader: (3)
Hello all.
I'm debating the ignition for my 517" bbc.
9.5 to 1 pump gas
Brodix plus 2 heads (fully worked)
Naturally aspirated
Thoughts:
MSD=might suddenly die
Does my boat need the multiple sparks down low to avoid loading up?
The Mallory marine electronic distributor looks like a nice piece.
In short, am I better off with a stand alone electronic ignition ( no box ) or do I really need a capacitive discharge ignition such as an MSD?
Opinions please.
Thanks, rob
I'm debating the ignition for my 517" bbc.
9.5 to 1 pump gas
Brodix plus 2 heads (fully worked)
Naturally aspirated
Thoughts:
MSD=might suddenly die
Does my boat need the multiple sparks down low to avoid loading up?
The Mallory marine electronic distributor looks like a nice piece.
In short, am I better off with a stand alone electronic ignition ( no box ) or do I really need a capacitive discharge ignition such as an MSD?
Opinions please.
Thanks, rob
#15
Thanks mike. Not sure what bob will spec for a cam yet.
I have the flow numbers and compression nailed down but I need to ensure the dry headers I have will fit so I can let bob know if the exhaust will be wet or dry.
Thanks to all for responding.
So to sum it up, the multiple spark ignition is good for low rpm usage so as to not load up plugs.
I have the flow numbers and compression nailed down but I need to ensure the dry headers I have will fit so I can let bob know if the exhaust will be wet or dry.
Thanks to all for responding.
So to sum it up, the multiple spark ignition is good for low rpm usage so as to not load up plugs.
#16
Registered
I've certainly heard a lot of bad about MSD and I have had to replace my 6M after 10 years. I also had to pull my distributor and clean it up, also after 10 years. I used gun blue and treated all the steel components and then a light coat of WD40. That was 5 years ago and everything still looks like it did 5 years ago. Whether or not you need a CD box, depends on a lot of factors. I have a pretty lumpy cam, I'm carbureted and I like to cruise down the inland waterway which is at least an hour of idling. With my current MSD setup I can idle for an hour, get to the lake and stand on it and no signs of spark plug loading. I have also checked the plugs after a long river cruise and they look great. The advantage of the MSD is that it is marine approved so no Coast Guard or Insurance issues. I looked long and hard at the Mallory ignition when I did my rebuild but stuck with the MSD because the Mallory tech recommended against a marine application. I did add a vent tube to my distributor cap and will be connecting it to my air cleaner housing to help pull moisture out of the distributor. The advantage with the MSD is the availability of all types of custom advance bushings, I tried several different types before I settled on locking mine at 34 degrees. Also their HVC 2 coils rock for voltage spark duration and current. I'm just relating my experience, my boat starts as fast or faster than any of my state of the art EFI cars and trucks.
#19
Registered
iTrader: (3)
The rusting issue, like Mike Tkach said, can be solved by coating a new distributor internals, with CRC SP-400. I did mine a few years back, they still look great.
As for "NEEDING" a CD ignition, I say, no you dont "need" it. The multiple sparks at low rpm, isnt a "bonus" so to speak of. Its because it is NEEDED, with a CD style ignition. Most people think, ''Oh, multiple sparks at low rpm, must help for fouling plugs''. Thats really not why they have it. It is an area by design of that particular style ignition, that simply needs help, in that area. A conventional ignition, doesnt need those multiple sparks at low rpm. Its about the duration of the spark. CD ignitions have a short spark duration, where a conventional one will have a longer spark duration. At low engine speeds, the multiple spark, makes up for the loss of spark duration.
As for "NEEDING" a CD ignition, I say, no you dont "need" it. The multiple sparks at low rpm, isnt a "bonus" so to speak of. Its because it is NEEDED, with a CD style ignition. Most people think, ''Oh, multiple sparks at low rpm, must help for fouling plugs''. Thats really not why they have it. It is an area by design of that particular style ignition, that simply needs help, in that area. A conventional ignition, doesnt need those multiple sparks at low rpm. Its about the duration of the spark. CD ignitions have a short spark duration, where a conventional one will have a longer spark duration. At low engine speeds, the multiple spark, makes up for the loss of spark duration.
#20
The rusting issue, like Mike Tkach said, can be solved by coating a new distributor internals, with CRC SP-400. I did mine a few years back, they still look great.
As for "NEEDING" a CD ignition, I say, no you dont "need" it. The multiple sparks at low rpm, isnt a "bonus" so to speak of. Its because it is NEEDED, with a CD style ignition. Most people think, ''Oh, multiple sparks at low rpm, must help for fouling plugs''. Thats really not why they have it. It is an area by design of that particular style ignition, that simply needs help, in that area. A conventional ignition, doesnt need those multiple sparks at low rpm. Its about the duration of the spark. CD ignitions have a short spark duration, where a conventional one will have a longer spark duration. At low engine speeds, the multiple spark, makes up for the loss of spark duration.
As for "NEEDING" a CD ignition, I say, no you dont "need" it. The multiple sparks at low rpm, isnt a "bonus" so to speak of. Its because it is NEEDED, with a CD style ignition. Most people think, ''Oh, multiple sparks at low rpm, must help for fouling plugs''. Thats really not why they have it. It is an area by design of that particular style ignition, that simply needs help, in that area. A conventional ignition, doesnt need those multiple sparks at low rpm. Its about the duration of the spark. CD ignitions have a short spark duration, where a conventional one will have a longer spark duration. At low engine speeds, the multiple spark, makes up for the loss of spark duration.
Is the idea that the msd improves idle quality and prevents plugs from loading up not true?