Mercruiser 6.2 Upgrades
#11
Thread Starter
Registered
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Admittedly, I'm not overly concerned with resale. The price I paid for the boat was something that i was very satisfied with; and I plan on keeping it for a long enough time that the difference in depreciation is not something I'm considering.
What about something like headers/aftermarket manifolds? As far as I've seen, a kit can be purchased for ~$1500, and as a bolt-on, something that could be removed should I ever want to revert back. Would they offer much of a performance increase while maintaining the stock exhaust exit?
Out of curiosity, what did you do to your 6.2s?
What about something like headers/aftermarket manifolds? As far as I've seen, a kit can be purchased for ~$1500, and as a bolt-on, something that could be removed should I ever want to revert back. Would they offer much of a performance increase while maintaining the stock exhaust exit?
Out of curiosity, what did you do to your 6.2s?
#12
Banned
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
on the Cobalt 220 BR - bravo III - do not remember about what prop changes I did but I did do some filing on the edges to sharpen them up on top of. Also did a lot of reshaping of the skeg and believe it or not that help as well. I could try to find some pics of the boat and send them to you if you like. The boat did handle very well & pretty fast for a family rec boat especially for a Cobalt.
IMO the placement of weight and some taken out really helped the boat. I think I gained 6 or 7 mph with props, running thru hull with silent choice, playing with weight, and messing with the lower unit skeg. No other mods nor to the engine were done. I was going to put aluminum exhaust on it to save even more weight but sold the boat beforehand. I remember the people who bought it were very surprised how fast and how fast the boat accelerated on the test drive.
IMO the placement of weight and some taken out really helped the boat. I think I gained 6 or 7 mph with props, running thru hull with silent choice, playing with weight, and messing with the lower unit skeg. No other mods nor to the engine were done. I was going to put aluminum exhaust on it to save even more weight but sold the boat beforehand. I remember the people who bought it were very surprised how fast and how fast the boat accelerated on the test drive.
#13
Registered
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 29
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/d...d-project.html
There's more than you could ever want to know about building 6.2s
There's more than you could ever want to know about building 6.2s
#14
Registered

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 11
From: Granger, Indiana
on the Cobalt 220 BR - bravo III - do not remember about what prop changes I did but I did do some filing on the edges to sharpen them up on top of. Also did a lot of reshaping of the skeg and believe it or not that help as well. I could try to find some pics of the boat and send them to you if you like. The boat did handle very well & pretty fast for a family rec boat especially for a Cobalt.
IMO the placement of weight and some taken out really helped the boat. I think I gained 6 or 7 mph with props, running thru hull with silent choice, playing with weight, and messing with the lower unit skeg. No other mods nor to the engine were done. I was going to put aluminum exhaust on it to save even more weight but sold the boat beforehand. I remember the people who bought it were very surprised how fast and how fast the boat accelerated on the test drive.
IMO the placement of weight and some taken out really helped the boat. I think I gained 6 or 7 mph with props, running thru hull with silent choice, playing with weight, and messing with the lower unit skeg. No other mods nor to the engine were done. I was going to put aluminum exhaust on it to save even more weight but sold the boat beforehand. I remember the people who bought it were very surprised how fast and how fast the boat accelerated on the test drive.
thanks again
3pointstar
#16
Registered

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 11
From: Granger, Indiana
Is that GPS speed? So far mine's topped out at 52.6GPS, with a fairly light load.
Obviously, I'm not really looking to go 70mph, moreso just gain a little bit of power without sacrificing reliability. The boat is a pleasure craft that I also ski behind (so captain's call is a definite requirement if I do cut into the transom).
Would doing headers / manifolds, while maintaining the stock exit location give me much (or anything) in the way of power? or just lighten the load in the transom?
Obviously, I'm not really looking to go 70mph, moreso just gain a little bit of power without sacrificing reliability. The boat is a pleasure craft that I also ski behind (so captain's call is a definite requirement if I do cut into the transom).
Would doing headers / manifolds, while maintaining the stock exit location give me much (or anything) in the way of power? or just lighten the load in the transom?
3pointstar
#17
Banned
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
The Merc 6.2 L - 377 CID is 320 hp. The 383 CID is really a 6.3 L and is not the same motor. The 6.2L has a longer stroke and at times it has caused some piston failures over the years. longer stokes in the cylinder bore are harder on pistons. I am not saying that every 6.2 L has piston problems but there has been some from Merc / GM. I am sure if you do a search on the net or even up here maybe some might pull up or least maybe mentioned about some form of it. I have seen 2 cases of it in person in the past 10 or 12 years..The 6.2 does not even come close in sales to the common 5.7 L - 350 in marine apps.
The 350 HO MAG is 300 hp coming from the sterndrives and in the towboat series engine at one time it was 315 hp from Merc. FYI
The 350 HO MAG is 300 hp coming from the sterndrives and in the towboat series engine at one time it was 315 hp from Merc. FYI
Last edited by BUP; 07-09-2014 at 09:35 AM.
#18
Registered

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 143
The Merc 6.2 L - 377 CID is 320 hp. The 383 CID is really a 6.3 L and is not the same motor. The 6.2L has a longer stroke and at times it has caused some piston failures over the years. longer stokes in the cylinder bore are harder on pistons. I am not saying that every 6.2 L has piston problems but there has been some from Merc / GM. I am sure if you do a search on the net or even up here maybe some might pull up or least maybe mentioned about some form of it. I have seen 2 cases of it in person in the past 10 or 12 years..The 6.2 does not even come close in sales to the common 5.7 L - 350 in marine apps.
The 350 HO MAG is 300 hp coming from the sterndrives and in the towboat series engine at one time it was 315 hp from Merc. FYI
The 350 HO MAG is 300 hp coming from the sterndrives and in the towboat series engine at one time it was 315 hp from Merc. FYI



