Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Could backfiring cause this? >

Could backfiring cause this?

Notices

Could backfiring cause this?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-16-2014 | 11:28 PM
  #81  
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
From: Omaha Ne
Default

[ATTACH=CONFIG]529666[/ATTACH]this is the crank. All other rods have clearance. #2 rod looks ok & so does the bottom of #1, until I start to torque the #1 cap. Then the clearance goes away. If the journal was polished wrong could it force the rods together?
Attached Thumbnails Could backfiring cause this?-20140731_134035.jpg  
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 05:13 AM
  #82  
Mbam's Avatar
Offshoreonly Advertiser
25 Year Member
Offshoreonly Advertiser
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 280
From: Pompano Beach FL, USA
Default

Originally Posted by donzi matt
What bearings are you running and what crank is this? If you should be using a P bearing with a chamfered edge for a crank with a fillet and you try to install H bearings you will have no side clearance. I quickly glanced but didn't see which crank you are running.
This is a common cause of side clearance problems. Can you take the caps off and post a close up photo of the journal with the 2 rods in place so we can see where the bearings are in relation to the edges of the journal?
Mbam is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 06:08 AM
  #83  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
Default

Just putting this out there not trying to insult anyone but are you sure u don't have the rods in backwards? I ask because I've seen it done before.
Black Baja is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 06:18 AM
  #84  
donzi matt's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 31
From: Moultonborough NH
Default

Using the good old google search with your part number shows you have a RPM forged crank. They list .125" radius on the crank. You should be using P bearings, not H bearings.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]529668[/ATTACH]
Attached Thumbnails Could backfiring cause this?-jonis_crank-328x288.jpg  
donzi matt is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 08:03 AM
  #85  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
Default

Originally Posted by donzi matt
Using the good old google search with your part number shows you have a RPM forged crank. They list .125" radius on the crank. You should be using P bearings, not H bearings.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]529668[/ATTACH]
I was just going to bring this up, the wider bearing will kill all the side clearance and eat them selves up quick...
ezstriper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 09:09 AM
  #86  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 4
Default

Well, this would explain why the crank is hard to turn over by hand. I would triple check everything with this bottom end build up. Make sure you research all the little things like correct rings for the application, ring end gap, piston / cyl wall clearance, rod bolt stretch (or torque), etc. There are a LOT of little gotchas, especially with a marine build, that can bite you in the azz and reduce this new build to scrap in a heartbeat if you are not careful. I built the bottom end on my engine, and I literally spent weeks researching all of these things, not only here on OSO, but also with tech support from the manufacturers. In the end, it took three times as long to put together, and I nearly drove half of the OSO crew insane building it, but I feel pretty good that it was done right and will hold together. (Looking for a big piece of something wooden, other than my head, to knock on here.)
Budman II is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 07:10 PM
  #87  
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
From: Omaha Ne
Default

Well Black Baja had it almost right, I somehow got the upper & lower bearings swapped on #1. I swapped them & reassembled and now have .016 clearance. Now that I have proper clearances on the sides I checked bearing clearance on the rods. I came up with .0015 to .002 across all 8 rods. Plastgage is all I have for this measurement so the actual clearance is closer to. 0017, not quite wide enough for .0015 but too wide for .002. The book says that this is within spec but on the tight side. What are your thoughts. I have stopped here for now.
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 07:19 PM
  #88  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,428
Likes: 3,955
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

How's the blood pressure Randy, time for a cocktail yet,

Last edited by F-2 Speedy; 09-17-2014 at 07:25 PM.
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 07:38 PM
  #89  
Randy Nielsen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
From: Omaha Ne
Default

The healthometer in my phone says that I will live through this. Lol
Randy Nielsen is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2014 | 07:44 PM
  #90  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,428
Likes: 3,955
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

You got this, just think how much your learning, I'm getting ready to open up a couple Gen 6 502's and redo them, converting from carb to EFI, good winter project
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.