Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Roots Blower Sizing >

Roots Blower Sizing

Notices

Roots Blower Sizing

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-25-2014 | 08:58 AM
  #61  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
Yes. A bit of a hijack, but kind of related because it's where our blowers came from. The 2 stroke detroit's are incredibly durable engines, and very well engineered. They were built to be universal, the front can be the back, anything from one side will fit on the other, you can join them together, throughout the same engine series almost every part is interchangeable. Compound supercharging was common practice (turbos feeding roots blowers). They were never intended to be a long term use engine, but were so well built they just wouldn't die, and gathered a very strong following, only phased out many years later by more efficient, environmentally friendly engines. Speaking of engineering, modern performance gas engines have nothing on 1950's diesel tech. Overhead cams, shaft mounted roller rockers, piston oilers, bushed solid roller lifters, turbos, etc. Sounds Familiar huh?
I was thinking that last night when you guys sparked me to read up on those vintage diesel engines. Man, the engineering they were doing back then. I find it very impressive, those men from that era, really had limited resources, and yet, were so innovative. Pretty awesome.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 09:06 AM
  #62  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Black Baja
Hey take it easy on them iron heads. Compared to the other manufactures Chevy was King.
I dont know man, the LS6 head vs the Hemi head? Or Fords SOHC heads?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 09:07 AM
  #63  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

[ATTACH=CONFIG]531502[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]531503[/ATTACH]
Attached Thumbnails Roots Blower Sizing-image.jpg   Roots Blower Sizing-image.jpg   Roots Blower Sizing-image.jpg  

Roots Blower Sizing-image.jpg  
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 09:10 AM
  #64  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

alex,in pic 1 does the exhaust come out in the center on top?also,what engine is it and what is the application?very interesting.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 09:14 AM
  #65  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 239
From: Michigan
Default

I don't want to hijack this thread so I will be short, some of the older ferry boats that run the straits of Mackinac still us these Monsters, I had a chance to go into their shop and look at their spare engines. very impressive for sure twin Turbos feeding twin blowers on a v-12 platform. I like to take these older slower ferrys to the Island just because! but it did make me think of the pioneers of racing taking these blowers off the Detroits and modifiying them to fit the 4 strokes. At the time I was running a roots on my boat. Made me respect their Heritage. Done now.

Great thread Joe!
abones is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 09:21 AM
  #66  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

No worries about hijacking. The purpose of these threads is to lead to good tech discussions. And with you guys chiming in its always a worthy read !
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 09:58 AM
  #67  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: monroe michigan
Default

Dam thought I was sweet with my 177 blowers,now I have blower envy.
MichiMike is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 10:02 AM
  #68  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
alex,in pic 1 does the exhaust come out in the center on top?also,what engine is it and what is the application?very interesting.
Yes it does. That's a 1954 GM EMD 2 stroke train engine in a 110' tug boat, and she pulls like a mofo.. The 567 series, which is 567ci per hole, was the earliest and smallest version of these engines. I think they were designed and first used in trains in the late 1930's by the same guy that developed the smaller detroit 2 strokes. The later versions are still commonly used in trains today. One of the other boats up here has a pair of 20cyl 710's. They make abour 3600hp each. There are also some four stroke engines made by other manufacturers, that copy the basic engine architecture because it is such a good design.
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 10:22 AM
  #69  
glassdave's Avatar
Neno the mind boggler
20 Year Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,080
Likes: 320
From: toledo oh
Default

Originally Posted by MichiMike
Dam thought I was sweet with my 177 blowers,now I have blower envy.
same here, i had a pair of 525SC's for years and thought they were the shiz, ran pretty much flawless and turnkey for nearly three hundred hours. Was planing on building a pair of clones for the 38 Scarab but on chatting with the builder its prolly gonna be BM 250's (or similar) for a multitude of reasons. I had always thought a cooler and pulley would have been a good mod for the Donzi but see now that the 525SC's was a comfortably well thought out and built engine but not a whole lot of room to grow with that set up. I will say one thing i did like the whine they put out lol.
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )
glassdave is offline  
Reply
Old 10-25-2014 | 11:20 AM
  #70  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 3,687
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
I was thinking that last night when you guys sparked me to read up on those vintage diesel engines. Man, the engineering they were doing back then. I find it very impressive, those men from that era, really had limited resources, and yet, were so innovative. Pretty awesome.
That was when our country was 80% manufacturing. I'm making up that #....but.....we where full on industry.

Manufacturing was relatively cheaper and we had a workforce that didn't mind working labor and getting dirty.

Big difference from now where we all want office jobs.
SB is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.