![]() |
Originally Posted by sutphen 30
(Post 4212938)
you can cut a fuel fill hose and add a return there.thats how mine was for many years till I got my new tank.
http://www.cpperformance.com/c-500-f...s-returns.aspx http://www.cpperformance.com/images/.../620-76300.jpg |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4212959)
Yup, like these from CP.
http://www.cpperformance.com/c-500-f...s-returns.aspx http://www.cpperformance.com/images/.../620-76300.jpg |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4212951)
I dont care how much pressure you throw at it, once you get to 1150hp or so, you run out of needle and seat area. Hence the dual needle and seat bowls become more needed.
|
OK, so I have my other thread going on where several folks are advising that I sh!tcan my electric pump and install a mechanical pump. I took off a mechanical Holley that looked identical to that six valve pump that MT posted. I know I will have to go with a composite or bronze tipped pushrod with my billet cam. Will I need to run a regulator with the six valve pump? Will #8 lines coming from the tank support 580ish HP?
FWIW, I was running that mechanical pump with a Q-jet on my 454. I'm guessing it just looks like the six valve and is not putting out the same pressure, because I don't think the needle and seat on a Q-jet will take much pressure before it blows off the seat. I'll have to pull it out of the attic and take a look at it. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4213134)
Qjet handles decent psi.
I like mech pumps over electric, but, did you prove your electric wasn't keeping up ? |
Qjet handles decent psi.
I like mech pumps over electric, but, did you prove your electric wasn't keeping up ? |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4213134)
Qjet handles decent psi.
I like mech pumps over electric, but, did you prove your electric wasn't keeping up ? |
WOW did not expect this, a lot of great info. Only now I have a lot more to think about, but I am leaning towards Teagues or Claysmith's pumps. Just have to figure out how to get it to fit between sea pump and block. I do have one more question, It seems that the lines between the tank and the carb have to be large, but the opening at the needle and seat is something like .030 so why do you need large lines to push through such a small opening. Just trying to understand.
|
Originally Posted by Randy
(Post 4213558)
WOW did not expect this, a lot of great info. Only now I have a lot more to think about, but I am leaning towards Teagues or Claysmith's pumps. Just have to figure out how to get it to fit between sea pump and block. I do have one more question, It seems that the lines between the tank and the carb have to be large, but the opening at the needle and seat is something like .030 so why do you need large lines to push through such a small opening. Just trying to understand.
|
Typical Holley N+S is .110. Many use up to .130". Remember times this by two since the Holley has two of them.
-6 to -8 into the carb is fine for 99% of Performance carb'd marine engines. We don't have to fight high acceleration G's like automobiles, so that makes it easier on our fuel systems. Edit in: We do average a ton more gph though. LOL. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4213579)
Typical Holley N+S is .110. Many use up to .130". Remember times this by two since the Holley has two of them.
-6 to -8 into the carb is fine for 99% of Performance carb'd marine engines. We don't have to fight high acceleration G's like automobiles, so that makes it easier on our fuel systems. Edit in: We do average a ton more gph though. LOL. |
I'll be more specific than just saying automobiles - street/strip and more specifically drag cars.
Example: A 600hp motor accelerates lot more hard in a suspensioned / tired car than the same motor in a boat can ever think of. That's what I was referring too. Just to be clear. Not to take away from boats. |
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4213582)
You must have never rode in my 240 Baja. You had to fight not to flip over the seat when I hit that thing. The whole boat would leap out of the water. There was no getting on plane :-)
|
Edit in: Double post.
|
118 - .101V Viton Stock Holley. For use
in low output motors, 450 HP and below, using 4-barrel carburetor. Useful in preventing high RPM enrichment on speedway motors with restrictor plates. Flow capacity 125#/hour @ 7 p.s.i. and .25" float drop. 118 - .110V Viton Stock Holley. Used in most applications, up to 650 HP with 4-barrel and to 400 HP with 2-barrel. Flow capacity 175#/hour @ 7 p.s.i., .25" float drop. 118 - .120V Viton Stock Holley. Used in most applications, up to 775 HP with 4-barrel and to 500 HP with 2-barrel. Flow capacity 215#/hour @ 7 p.s.i., .25" float drop. 118 - .130RV Largest Viton needle and seat available. Recommended for high output 2-barrel motors and single 4-barrel motors producing over 750 HP. Will flow 275#/ hour @ 7 p.s.i. and .25" float drop. Will not hold idle pressure above 8 p.s.i. With that information, lets say you have two .130 needle and seats to provide fuel to. .130x2=.260. Thats a little over 1/4'' or .250 diameter for the 2 needle and seats. Now, the smallest diameter in a #6 line, is .30. A #8 line, is .390. A #10, .48. Not talking about the hose inner diameter, but the actual size of the thru hole at the flare. Now, Lets say your engine NEEDS .130 seats, to provide enough fuel to the engine. You can see, where a #6 line, with the same 7lbs of pressure, will work, as it should be large enough, barely. A #8, even better. However, that is on the PRESSURE side of things. The inlet side of things, doesnt move as much as fuel since obviously its not under pressure. Therefore, you can see where a #6 would not suffice in that situation. So basically, when it comes to fuel lines, better off erroring to the large size is always a good idea. |
Yup, line length, bends, turns, abrupt flow direction changes, etc all effects things.
Let's keep the good info going. Don't forget to line up the windows of your N&S with the inlet of the bowl when adjusting your floats. Some N&S companies are thoughtful enough to line the windows up with the flats on the adjusting nuts but not all doe this. Just a tech tip while on the subject. |
Just putting this out there. Not all -an fittings are created equal some are high flow some not. All are overpriced.
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4213596)
118 - .101V Viton Stock Holley. For use
in low output motors, 450 HP and below, using 4-barrel carburetor. Useful in preventing high RPM enrichment on speedway motors with restrictor plates. Flow capacity 125#/hour @ 7 p.s.i. and .25" float drop. 118 - .110V Viton Stock Holley. Used in most applications, up to 650 HP with 4-barrel and to 400 HP with 2-barrel. Flow capacity 175#/hour @ 7 p.s.i., .25" float drop. 118 - .120V Viton Stock Holley. Used in most applications, up to 775 HP with 4-barrel and to 500 HP with 2-barrel. Flow capacity 215#/hour @ 7 p.s.i., .25" float drop. 118 - .130RV Largest Viton needle and seat available. Recommended for high output 2-barrel motors and single 4-barrel motors producing over 750 HP. Will flow 275#/ hour @ 7 p.s.i. and .25" float drop. Will not hold idle pressure above 8 p.s.i. With that information, lets say you have two .130 needle and seats to provide fuel to. .130x2=.260. Thats a little over 1/4'' or .250 diameter for the 2 needle and seats. Now, the smallest diameter in a #6 line, is .30. A #8 line, is .390. A #10, .48. Not talking about the hose inner diameter, but the actual size of the thru hole at the flare. Now, Lets say your engine NEEDS .130 seats, to provide enough fuel to the engine. You can see, where a #6 line, with the same 7lbs of pressure, will work, as it should be large enough, barely. A #8, even better. However, that is on the PRESSURE side of things. The inlet side of things, doesnt move as much as fuel since obviously its not under pressure. Therefore, you can see where a #6 would not suffice in that situation. So basically, when it comes to fuel lines, better off erroring to the large size is always a good idea. |
Originally Posted by Bawana
(Post 4213836)
MT you can't figure it that way....Its pie R squared... ie: take a .130 needle .. it would be .065x .065x 3.1415 =.01327 times two needle & seat per carb = .02654; now a 1/4" hose or tube would be .125x.125x3.1415 =.04908. Its almost double
So, the question is, if we know lets say a .130 needle and seat can flow roughly 275lbs per hour, or 45 gallons per hour, times 2 for a single carb.....What size fuel line does one need to be able to move more fuel or at least keep up and move 90 gallons per hour, with the carb at 7psi of pressure? Then we need to calculate losses for restrictive fittings, bends, length of line, and so on. Thats for the pressure side. Whats the calculation for the inlet side of the pump, when dealing with suction? |
Originally Posted by Bawana
(Post 4213836)
MT you can't figure it that way....Its pie R squared... ie: take a .130 needle .. it would be .065x .065x 3.1415 =.01327 times two needle & seat per carb = .02654; now a 1/4" hose or tube would be .125x.125x3.1415 =.04908. Its almost double
Thanks, easy to forget. |
MT, I believe Aeroquip has a hose size chart for fluids. See if you can find it. I'm out for tonight. Later fella's. Good discussion so far.
|
MT Problem with the suction side of the fuel pump is, there are so many variables, ie; length of draw, material & resistance being drawn threw, size, length & material of pick up. micron & filter size inline , number, type & size of fittings, G forces.............. you get the Idea here.. If you have all the above, there is a formula. But off the top of my head .... sorry its not in there, LOL. We all know that in most cases you can get away with # 10 line. Lets face it most tank pick ups are between 3/8 to 5/8"... so on the suction side its not going to do much, going way bigger then your pick up size... That being said, if you have too much restriction on the suction side of things ( not to forget vent sizing) you will see it in you WOT fuel pressure, and lose thereof.
|
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4213569)
Randy you pretty much answered your own question. You are pushing the fuel through the seat not pulling. The smaller the hose/ fittings and whatever b4 the bump create restrictions and reduce the efficiency of the pump. If you feed the pump with a small hose then have a larger hose on the outlet side of the pump you also reduce the efficiency of the pump because you have to fill the larger hose before the pump can make pressure to go through the seat. It's the same thing if you do a regulator b4 the carb you are pushing through a small oriface then filling a larger hose b4 you can make pressure to go through the seat. If you use a regulator b4 the carb (I use it after) all you need is -4 after the regulator. I've seen a 3000hp motor run with -6 after the regulator and -4 on the dyno. Believe it or not it made a hair more power with the -4. I think the largest regulator out there has a .125 hole in it.
|
Originally Posted by Bawana
(Post 4213860)
I don't know what regulator you use . But any good one will have at least a .437 orifice. If you size it correctly having it before the carb is just fine. Otherwise I totally agree with the above.
|
The information on this site is unbelievable, ok so I am going to run -10 line from tank ( making sure pick up is big enough ) to filter inlet -10 from filter outlet to pump inlet then -6 to carb. That should be more then enough to feed 800 hp 598 ci motor. The problem I still have is how do I mount the mech. fuel pump to the block with the sea water pump in the way. Is there a different type of sea pump that I can use. Also I have never seen the type of sea pump that is on this boat, ( just bought it about 3 weeks ago ) It has water inlet and outlets that face the block instead of going straight back. I would really like to run a mech. pump but its looking like I my have to run a elec. just because I cant mount the mech one. Any ideas....
|
Originally Posted by Randy
(Post 4214764)
The information on this site is unbelievable, ok so I am going to run -10 line from tank ( making sure pick up is big enough ) to filter inlet -10 from filter outlet to pump inlet then -6 to carb. That should be more then enough to feed 800 hp 598 ci motor. The problem I still have is how do I mount the mech. fuel pump to the block with the sea water pump in the way. Is there a different type of sea pump that I can use. Also I have never seen the type of sea pump that is on this boat, ( just bought it about 3 weeks ago ) It has water inlet and outlets that face the block instead of going straight back. I would really like to run a mech. pump but its looking like I my have to run a elec. just because I cant mount the mech one. Any ideas....
Also, for what its worth, I personally would run a -8AN line up to the carb. I mean, what ya saving by going with a #6, 12 bucks? Heck alot of the nice dual feed premade carb fuel logs are -8 anyhow. Just my opinion on that anyway. I am no engineer. I've used these on some single carb setups. They have a 1/8 NPT gauge port too http://www.summitracing.com/search/p...4%2B4294949389 |
I'm using a fuel log exactly like the summit piece MT posted the link to. I'm planning a -8 for all my fuel lines. I wonder if I should upsize the tank to water separator line to -10. I was thinking -8 as the pickup is 3/8 NPT on a 1/2 tube in the tank. I plan on a straight 3/8 NPT to -8 to a long radius 90 degree fitting on the supply host out of the tank.
I bought a 0 to 15 psi fuel pressure transducer for a dash mounted fuel pressure gauge. The transducer was twice the price of the gauge. Go figure. That said, I'm going to feel good being able to watch fuel pressure at the helm and at full load and when running hard. I should add that the engine will be a 517" NA piece. Relatively mild at around 650 to 675 HP. |
in my 1200 hp supercharged engines i run a -10 from tank pickup to filter head,then-10 to my a1000 aeromotive pump then-10 to my fuel log,then-6 to each fuel bowl.my regulator is behind the fuel log with-8 line back to tank.at WOT my fuel pressure never goes below 6.5 lbs.i am at 8 lbs everywhere except WOT.
|
A bought a fuel log off ebay for $50 it looks identical to the $400 Aeromotive log and functions just the same. I can tell you how many time I had the bowls off my carb and never had to take the log off. I have -10 to the log fuel regulator hangs off the back and then the return. Nice thing about the log with the swivels is if the starboard valve cover needs to come off I can swivel the log up and get the valve cover off. Couldn't do that with my old setup had to disconnect the fuel line. My buddy has a holley log that does the same thing that mine does but he has never taken his bowls off because he thinks his Nickerson carb is perfect (you should see the plugs).
|
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4214943)
. My buddy has a holley log that does the same thing that mine does but he has never taken his bowls off because he thinks his Nickerson carb is perfect (you should see the plugs).
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4215050)
Nickerson really sold alot of Kool-Aid to guys over the years !
|
Sounds about right!
|
Mild Thunder I took a pic of the sea pump, trying to post it. I wish I would have know how you guys felt about Nickerson before I had them do my carb. I cant say I was totally thrilled with the results for the money.
I am also going to run -8 lines to the carb. How do you mount the regulator at the back of the fuel lines and keep the press at the bowl at 7 to 8 psi. doesn't the press. get regulated after the regulator. Sorry for all the questions but I want to learn and want to do this right. |
Randy I will have a good mark iv pump for sale in a week for so if you need one. Nickersons stuff isn't that bad but it is hit or miss. For what he charges you can almost buy a new carb that will work as good if not better.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.