Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Dyno proven 675-700 HP 540CI recipes? >

Dyno proven 675-700 HP 540CI recipes?

Notices

Dyno proven 675-700 HP 540CI recipes?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-05-2015, 10:13 AM
  #281  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Thanks for coming in bob. Always one to clear the air. I too save emails, pm's, etc. This thread should really get good now. I know a few who feel the need to do the same.

While you are here, can you give us some more specifics on tims cams ? Not just .050 numbers

Also, maybe clear up how tim screwed you out of that 900 bucks for that head?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:00 AM
  #282  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Tim, look at the bright side. At least you


A. HAVE A BOAT

B. HAVE A BOAT THAT RUNS

C. HAVE ENGINES THAT ARE COMPLETE NOT PROTOTYPES

D. HAVE A GARAGE BIGGER SOME PEOPLES SHOPS

E. YOU CAN SAY YOU BUILT THEM OVER A FEW BEERS WITH A BUDDY, PROBABLY HAD A TON OF LAUGHS ALONG THE WAY.

F. Hang out with more azz than most guys see in a lifetime every weekend.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:12 AM
  #283  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

True, 2 more days until I get to do it again!!!

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Tim, look at the bright side. At least you


A. HAVE A BOAT

B. HAVE A BOAT THAT RUNS

C. HAVE ENGINES THAT ARE COMPLETE NOT PROTOTYPES

D. HAVE A GARAGE BIGGER SOME PEOPLES SHOPS

E. YOU CAN SAY YOU BUILT THEM OVER A FEW BEERS WITH A BUDDY, PROBABLY HAD A TON OF LAUGHS ALONG THE WAY.

F. Hang out with more azz than most guys see in a lifetime every weekend.
Full Force is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:28 AM
  #284  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
KAAMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 4,464
Received 78 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

I'm just curious to know if a "GIL" exhaust system is not a good exhaust design, then what are some other options for exhaust designs? Also, would the GILs be better for a supercharged/blower setup? Is a GIL not good enough for---what size CID naturally aspirated engine? What CID is needed for the GILs to work/breath properly?

Back in the 1980's, I would watch guys bolt on the GILs and watch their RPM increase, but we didn't have GPS's back then to really see any definitive increases in speed, but they seemed to make the engines wake up.

Back then, people had to learn that if you upgraded your engines to make more power thru the induction system, that you also had to make a change in the exhaust as well. I think some guy's boats even went slower until they installed the GILs....it took a while for some people to understand that. The GILs were (or at least seemed to be) a big improvement over a stock Merc cast iron exhaust system---at least back then. I cannot imagine the GILs really being that bad of a design---what do you guys think?

Last edited by KAAMA; 08-05-2015 at 11:31 AM.
KAAMA is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:31 AM
  #285  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,141
Received 817 Likes on 374 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
I find that very hard to believe, especially with gil manifolds at that power level. Ive seen many marine exhaust comparisons over the years. Blown engines, not as sensitive to exhaust tuning. Bigger ci na stuff, prinary diameter, length, collector length, collector size, all can have a major effect . One in particular 2 weeks ago was a NA 572 build with cmi tractor pipe headers. They had short 6 inch tails with a small silencer type of baffle to keep the noise down. Not really a restrictive looking piece, but , i suggested to remove them and do another pull. 41hp gain, and 38ft lbs if i recall.

Also, a well known oso marine engine builder recently ran a mild 509 build on the dyno with the stock 4780 holley 800. He borrowed a 1050 quick fuel 4150 blower carb from us. After fine tuning it, as it was pretty rich, the engine picked up 50-60hp over the stock 800 holley.

Of course, this is where the dyno comes to play. I try to keep my advice on oso based on what ive done, seen, etc.
Was that at ateco, just heard same story from a customer who got a engine from him
articfriends is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:36 AM
  #286  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
Was that at ateco, just heard same story from a customer who got a engine from him
No , wasnt ateco.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:37 AM
  #287  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (1)
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,141
Received 817 Likes on 374 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
Supercharged ?

I won't believe it NA, because I won't believe it. LOL.
Unless......the 'collector' lengths and ID where at 'worst' lengths with the headers. Be careful on this, even the dyno ! I had a 600hp 454 that gained almost 80hp (proven at track too) that by mistake found out it had 'worst' length and design collectors. More exactly, it was a 525hp motor that became a 600hp motor. Yup. Carburetor ended up 'taking' almost 10 more jet sizes. Best tune vs best tune.

Once figured out, even ran into mild 300hp level motors that where shot in the azz to the tune of 30 or so hp.
I know that at lower hp levels there can be very little gain with exhaust. When i had 600 to 650 hp blown 502 in my boat i still had stock cam, spent 2 days putting lightning headers on vs stock cast manifolds and gained ZERO on top end, even after retuning the boat
articfriends is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 11:42 AM
  #288  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KAAMA
I'm just curious to know if a "GIL" exhaust system is not a good exhaust design, then what are some other options for exhaust designs? Also, would the GILs be better for a supercharged/blower setup? Is a GIL not good enough for---what size CID naturally aspirated engine? What CID is needed for the GILs to work/breath properly?

Back in the 1980's, I would watch guys bolt on the GILs and watch their RPM increase, but we didn't have GPS's back then to really see any definitive increases in speed, but they seemed to make the engines wake up.

Back then, people had to learn that if you upgraded your engines to make more power thru the induction system, that you also had to make a change in the exhaust as well. I think some guy's boats even went slower until they installed the GILs....it took a while for some people to understand that. The GILs were (or at least seemed to be) a big improvement over a stock Merc cast iron exhaust system---at least back then. I cannot imagine the GILs really being that bad of a design---what do you guys think?
Mark, i dont know if i would say the gils are a bad design, and certainly better than mercs iron center rise manifolds. But, i think what we consider "mild" engines today, are what one would consider "wild" in the 80s. A 540ci making maybe 650, 700, or more is a far cry from say an old 400-450hp 454 deal.

I believe a 540ci, with a hot cam, good flowing heads, good induction, can benefit from a good exhaust setup. Simple things like collector extensions can make a significant difference, let alone primary diameter, length, etc etc. Like sb said earlier, a NA deal is more sensitive to exhaust tuning, where a forced induction deal just isnt the same.

Again, this is where dyno tuning comes in handy! At least for finding answers ...
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 12:04 PM
  #289  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
KAAMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 4,464
Received 78 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Yeah, that was a long time ago....back in the early 80's. I suppose anything was better than the old stock Merc cast iron log style manifolds from back then. I have always heard good things about the Stainless Marine exhaust systems and have recommended them to people on here in the past.
KAAMA is offline  
Old 08-05-2015, 12:20 PM
  #290  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

I hear alot mention "stainless marine" ..they make a great product no doubt. Their standard manifolds, and Gen III manifolds, are very different. Standard manifold is typical divided runner, into a 3.5 gas pipe tail. Gen III, are a split runner manifold as well, but with a massive cast elbow, that goes into a 4.5 gas pipe, with 5 inch overall diameter tail. Mostly found on large forced induction setups.

I think for manifolds, it was and is hard to beat the old PFM /Eickert style manifolds. They are basicallly a cast aluminum header, with long runner lengths. Not just a short 8 inch runner dumping into a common plenum or tailpipe.

This is old stuff pretty much. Same principles guys 50 years ago were ditching their manifolds for headers on musclecars making 400hp and going faster.
MILD THUNDER is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.