Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Going blown have a few questions? >

Going blown have a few questions?

Notices

Going blown have a few questions?

Old 12-24-2014 | 08:36 PM
  #51  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 2
From: Vancouver BC
Default

So MT's motors make 1.71 HP per cube at 6#'s. no chiller, and a B&M blower. Zul's 540 makes 1.78 per cube at 6.5#'s with a better blower, solid roller, good heads, etc.

Where is all the controversy coming from? Because of .07hp per cube? Seems reasonable to me.
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Reply
Old 12-24-2014 | 09:20 PM
  #52  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

he was asked several times to post the dyno sheet,won,t do it.kind of like the thread about the boat engine with 30 hrs on the rebuild can i see the paperwork,sorry i don,t have any paperwork,NO PROOF but who really cares anyway?he stated almost 1000 hp so if that means 990 hp the number is 1.83 hp per cu in.easily achieved with a whipple but not so easy with an undersized 8.71.jmo.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 09:47 AM
  #53  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
So MT's motors make 1.71 HP per cube at 6#'s. no chiller, and a B&M blower. Zul's 540 makes 1.78 per cube at 6.5#'s with a better blower, solid roller, good heads, etc.

Where is all the controversy coming from? Because of .07hp per cube? Seems reasonable to me.
Alex, what is your thoughts on static compression? I've had a lot of guys look at me like I was a reckless maniac because my engines are 9:1 with blowers lol. My blowers are 7% under driven right now making 6psi. Actually been running this setup for quite a while now, been working great. I know everyone likes the 7.5-8.25:1 range for blown stuff, but I've been outside that bounds a bit and liking how it works.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 11:22 AM
  #54  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,168
From: taxachusetts
Default

I was told the same thing,,I'm at 9-1 also,,been running like that for years,why.because most of the time I'm cruising at 3500rpm and 65-69mph.I wanted the engines the most efficient in my cruise for what I had.I almost went 9.5-1 but thought I wouldn't push my luck on the wot runs.still didn't want to rely on my knock sensors all the time.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 11:47 AM
  #55  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: OK CIty, OK
Default

My new engine will be ~9.1 static and I also thought that was too much for boost. Maybe not.
Cole2534 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 11:49 AM
  #56  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,168
From: taxachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole2534
My new engine will be ~9.1 static and I also thought that was too much for boost. Maybe not.
I run those junk 088 iron heads no less.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 11:57 AM
  #57  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: OK CIty, OK
Default

Me too...don't tell anyone.
Cole2534 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 04:47 PM
  #58  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
Default

Originally Posted by Cole2534
My new engine will be ~9.1 static and I also thought that was too much for boost. Maybe not.
My old combination 540 9:1 088 heads pro charger 5.5lbs 900hp. 7lbs ecm pulled timing like crazy. For all the anti procharger guys - lack of low rpm hp/tq planning issues. When you would hit it out of the hole the boat leaped out of the water (literally)
Black Baja is offline  
Reply
Old 12-25-2014 | 05:25 PM
  #59  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 93
From: yorkville,il
Default

9 to 1 with iron heads and a decent amount of boost can be dangerous,espically with the wrong cam and no chiller.don,t believe every thing you read because i have seen a lot of guys posting up bad advice lately.as far as the guy with the 540 making near 1000 hp on 6.5 lbs of boost,i guess he could make 1500 with 8 lbs.why spend your money on a whipple when all you need is an 8.71?
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2014 | 11:05 PM
  #60  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Black Baja
My old combination 540 9:1 088 heads pro charger 5.5lbs 900hp. 7lbs ecm pulled timing like crazy. For all the anti procharger guys - lack of low rpm hp/tq planning issues. When you would hit it out of the hole the boat leaped out of the water (literally)
EFI I'm assuming?
hogie roll is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.