Still Looking!
#12
Registered

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 870
Likes: 259
From: Portland, OR
If I had the money I'd have triples... nothing says BAD ASS like three shiny drives hanging off the back! When I work on mine I wish it was a $ingle... in retrospect that's what I should have bought being our first boat and all, so we settled in between. Practicality= single, ego and speed= twins lol. So far this has been my experience as a new go-fast owner.
#14
Registered

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 10
From: westville, NJ
the 7 mph is about all a twin boat will do with 1 non-running engine. BUT that is 7 mph faster than a single engine boat with 1 non-running engine...buy the highest quality best condition hull you can. engines are the easiest and cheapest part of a boat. stay away from old novas with twins for 5000 bucks...
#15
I helped a random guy in FL years ago try to track down an electrical malfunction that affected everything from his stereo to engine hatch to drive trim; on his BRAND new boat. All he could do was start and stop the engine. In peering around looking for fuses and such, came across cabin/helm construction that was nothing more that black painted plywood and wood screws. I am sorry to say it, but that experience left a bad taste in my mouth. For the price point though; they are right for someone.
#16
the 7 mph is about all a twin boat will do with 1 non-running engine. BUT that is 7 mph faster than a single engine boat with 1 non-running engine...buy the highest quality best condition hull you can. engines are the easiest and cheapest part of a boat. stay away from old novas with twins for 5000 bucks...
True points on single vs. twin. Twins almost always get you home at some point.
FWIW, I can bring my twin up on one engine/drive and run about 30mph or so when needed, but it's not a great idea with all the stress on that drive.
#17
Registered

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Brookfield Wi
#18
#20




