![]() |
Originally Posted by TomZ
(Post 4269162)
Got it Joe. Thanks! The oil thermostat set up is on my shopping list.
Originally Posted by adk61
(Post 4269301)
no visible issues...
|
Originally Posted by adk61
(Post 4269258)
Yes Mild... think about it... when you have lets say a 454 with a bore of 4.310 for eg, the cylinder wall thickness (thinner) will have a significant effect on (friction surface temp) the wall's ability to cool... as opposed to lets say a dart/merlin 4.500 bore (thicker sleeve) temp is stable all around the bore and cools evenly and effectively... if I'm understanding your statement correctly???
|
dumping a small amount of water on a siamesed block prevents steam pockets in the rear of the block,if that happens the steam will not let the water flow through the block.i see no reason to dump from the back of the block on a standard 454 block.
|
When I tapped mine for dumps, I mainly did it to bleed off some excessive water pressure . I felt dumping it there was better than dumping it prior to the engine .
|
It's not the block that gets the steam pockets it's the head. I've tested back to back dumping water out the back of the intake/ blocked off. Absolutely no difference in temp either way. This was with a Dart block. After thinking about it I would have to say that if you pull water from the back of the intake (create a short circuit in the cooling system) it would be more prone to getting steam pockets in the head than if it was blocked off. I can tell you this from experimenting that introducing cold water to the back of the intake drastically reduces detonation. If you look at some of the high dollar cylinder heads out there now they have a manifold made into the back of the head...
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4269295)
I don't run any water thermostats. My water temp coming out of my block is never more than 110*. Water going in is between 60-70 deg.
I used to run water dumps off the rear off my intakes when I had 250 blowers. When I switched to the 420 blowers I didn't drill and tap the intakes. I've been running it that way for about 100 hours now with no issues. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4269305)
Considering these engines have been supercharged since 1999, I am fine running without them. Mercury marine, general motors, ran without them. Not saying it's wrong to run them, as if I wasn't so lazy I would be.
|
Originally Posted by rmbuilder
(Post 4269290)
Tom,
Understood. My question was intended to determine the temperature differential, from max to min, in various areas of the block. Based on that information, running an open bore block, seeing potential 60 º min. water temp and a max bore coolant temp of 160º, I would suggest you open the gaps from .003"-.004" to compensate for the lowest internal temp. The concept of thermal stabilization is a worthwhile conversation (for another thread), however i do not want to derail your inquiry for a viable answer to your question. Bob |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4269328)
When I tapped mine for dumps, I mainly did it to bleed off some excessive water pressure . I felt dumping it there was better than dumping it prior to the engine .
|
While on the subject of engine cooling and hot spots.....How many engines have ever been built by GM, Mercuruiser or Mercury Racing without circulating pumps?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.