What's wrong with AFR's exhaust port?
thanks for sharing !
02-27-2015 | 10:39 AM
#12
Registered
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 3
From: Fredericksburg, Va
On another thread it was brought up that AFR's exhaust port leaves a lot to be desired. I would like to know what's wrong with the port... Please don't reply to this thread with flow numbers on such and such's flow bench. When it comes to the exhaust side of things you minus well throw the flow bench in the garbage because it means nothing. You can pretty much do that for the intake side of things as well but we will leave that for another thread because this is going to be complicated enough. So what's wrong with the port I ask? Countless engine builds putting up big numbers N/A and Boosted. I really want to know what's wrong with it.
02-27-2015 | 10:55 AM
#14
Registered
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 405
From: Collierville, TN and Pickwick Lake
JimV, read the entire thread last night. http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...s-540-sci.html
Last edited by payuppsucker; 02-27-2015 at 10:58 AM.
02-27-2015 | 11:00 AM
#15
Registered
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
I think black baja was referring to what "Ben Perfected" stated in the other thread. What I got from the thread a couple years ago where JimV was posting, was that when he flowed several sets of AFR heads they did not flow the numbers claimed on AFRs website , on his flow bench. I think?
02-27-2015 | 11:08 AM
#19
Registered
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,018
Likes: 1,521
From: Grand Rapids, MI
JimV, read the entire thread last night. http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...s-540-sci.html
I believe he said it can be improved. Just like the Dart intake port, his opinion. I don't believe something is wrong with the port.
Last edited by Rookie; 02-27-2015 at 12:56 PM.
