Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Drive alignment question >

Drive alignment question

Notices

Drive alignment question

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-14-2015 | 10:04 AM
  #21  
14 apache's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 15
From: Northport N.Y.
Default

Originally Posted by 43sv
It also depends on the amount of power you have, and the gimble bushings ect. I have run as much as 3/8 to 1/2 inch. Put a wratchet strap on your prop shafts and click away and you will be shocked.
If you put a ratchet strap on it might brake it of freak out from what you see. LOL

Don't forget if you are running a drive higher than the bottom you need more toe to compensate for the unbalanced propellers more load on tie bar. Bravo not so much toe.
14 apache is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-2015 | 10:08 PM
  #22  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 237
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Well after allot of careful measuring i found that when the trim indicators where even the drives where about 3/8 inch different in elevation at the prop shaft measured using the flat underside of the swim platform as the horizon line which was also parallel to the top of the extension boxes within 1/16 of an inch. After adjusting the indicators to read true and leveling the drives to the 7 on the indicators I measured the drive center line in several places and came up with 34 1/8 as a center to center measurement. At this point the center line of the prop shafts measured 33 7/8. I used a snug (not cranked) ratchet strap to eliminate any free play while taking measurements (which there wasn't any noticeable) and carefully adjusted the tie bar half turn at a time until I got 34 5/16 giving me 3/16 toe in. I went 3/16 based on the thought that because of the extension boxes there may be slightly more flex in the system under load than a flush transom mounted setup. Total adjustment was 7/16 inch which wasn't as much as I originally thought but still considerable. Now I know exactly where my drives are at when trimmed to 7 which has returned the best speed numbers thus far.
dandercam1 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-2015 | 12:18 PM
  #23  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 19
From: Washington, MO
Default

Looks like you were toe out a bit, so you should notice an improvement in tracking and handling, and maybe a touch increase in speed. You got is set-up just right now. Let us know how it compares.
4mulafastech is offline  
Reply
Old 04-16-2015 | 04:30 PM
  #24  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 237
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Everything I have read about the Donzi 33 Daytona leads me to believe that with 500efi's the boat should run 80 - 82. Since I have owned the boat I have seen 77 - 78 consistently and 79 once. I just got my props back from Bblades and had a little work done in the hopes of picking up another 100 rpm (was turning 5100). I'm hoping to see 80 this summer. The guys that seem to be getting the most impressive speed numbers out of this setup are running 30p lab finished props. I am still running labbed 28's and I can't see how guys are running 30's but who knows what will happen now that the drives are aligned how they should be.
dandercam1 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-17-2015 | 07:59 AM
  #25  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 19
From: Washington, MO
Default

Your previous numbers show 13-14% slip. If you turn 5200 rpm, at 13% slip it is 80 mph, so definitely looks doable. You may even reduce slip% a bit with the drives in better alignment. Good luck!
4mulafastech is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2015 | 09:16 PM
  #26  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 237
Likes: 5
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

It is gonna be a few more weeks till I can hit the water and try out the new setup but I will definitely keep everyone posted on the results.... thanks again guys
dandercam1 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2015 | 09:22 PM
  #27  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 372
From: Traverse City MI
Default

There's a thread on here where Reggie Fountain says all boats should have the nose cones about an 1/8th" closer together then the prop shafts no matter which way the props rotate.
offshorexcursion is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2015 | 09:50 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 239
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
There's a thread on here where Reggie Fountain says all boats should have the nose cones about an 1/8th" closer together then the prop shafts no matter which way the props rotate.
Is that when measuring with the big Gold chain dangling, or without?
abones is offline  
Reply
Old 04-19-2015 | 11:02 PM
  #29  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,612
Likes: 372
From: Traverse City MI
Default

My Baja ran faster with the nose cones closer together with props spinning out vs

Slower with props closer together with props spinning out
offshorexcursion is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.