Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Detonation Issues - "Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build" >

Detonation Issues - "Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build"

Notices

Detonation Issues - "Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build"

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-23-2015, 06:20 PM
  #101  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Knock retard parameters are adjusted in this area. They can be adjusted so ignition retard actions are more or less aggressive when knock is detected. Adjust, as desired, based on the applications.

Knock Sensor Tuning

Holley EFI systems can receive input directly from either Resonant (1 wire) or Non-Resonant (2 wire) knock sensors. Make sure you properly configure them in the Ignition Parameters section. The following must be configured:

• Sensor Type – 1 wire (Resonant) or 2 wire (Non-Resonant)
• Number – 0 if none are used. 1 or 2 if knock sensors are being used.
• Bore – Engine Cylinder Bore Diameter (inches). Used only if a 2 wire sensor is used.
• Sensitivity – Used to tune/adjust the sensor signal so the ECU can properly detect when real knock is present.

Knock sensor signatures vary and depend on the sensor itself as well all facets of the specific engine and chassis component design. Just changing the engine mounts (or many other components) can change the knock signature of an engine. This is one reason why it is always recommended to program in the “proper” ignition timing curve. You should not fully depend on knock sensors to pick up all knock events as well as always trust that you are not getting false knock triggers.

Due to the fact that this EFI system is designed to use any type of Resonant and Non-Resonant knock sensor on any engine and chassis variation, a tunable parameter must exist such that the ECU can recognize what is “real knock” and what is “false knock”. This parameter ultimately must be “tuned” by the end user. This parameter is the “Sensitivity” parameter which is found in the System Parameters ICF under “Ignition Parameters” and “Knock Sensors”. Increasing the value of this parameter DECREASES the point at which the ECU will recognize a certain signal level as knock.

• If you are seeing “false knock”, DECREASE this parameter.
• If you are not seeing “real knock”, INCREASE this parameter.

There are parameters that can be logged in order to assist with the proper tuning of the knock sensor. The only caveat is the user must know when “real knock” is occurring. If you have open headers, etc, this may be impossible to audibly hear knock. Knock occurs before it can be audibly heard, but if you can audibly here it, you know it is occurring.

There is a parameter that can be viewed in the data monitor and logged to assist in this tuning called “Knock Level”. This knock level is a scaled knock sensor reading level that is dependent on the Sensitivity parameter entered in the knock sensor setup. When the “Knock Level” value is over a value of 80, the ECU sees this as a knock event and will retard timing (whether a real knock event or false).

• If you are getting “false knock”, DECREASE the sensitivity value in the Knock Sensor Setup.
• If you are NOT sensing “real knock”, INCREASE the sensitivity value in the Knock Sensor Setup.

NOTE: You want to see the “Knock Level” value go higher than 80 when you have real knock occurring, and stay below 80 when there is no actual knock present.

Perform data logging to view these parameters as it is almost impossible to view them real time.

A sensitivity value of 35 is a good starting point for some applications.

Last edited by SDFever; 11-23-2015 at 06:23 PM.
SDFever is offline  
Old 11-23-2015, 06:35 PM
  #102  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They have. The Holley System does this nicely but even that should not be left in full learn all the time cause it too can create problems. But using it as an inactive monitor works nicely. Many guys think they have a leak-free exhaust cause it hasn't cause any visible problems. But i can tell you that i bought a brand new set of headers that leaked first day. Went to our welder and had them repaired. I took my sensor out of my tail pipe yesterday after many hours of running in the salt; it was bone dry. There was a certain amount of water that just became "acceptable" to me until i realized that you can have a dry system if it's in good order. This also does not take into account condensation which is heavy in marine engines. More than you might ever think.. The sensors in road cars is far upstream though. If you were to place those sensors closer to the back (which would be similar to a boat) you would be replacing them far more often.

Originally Posted by thirdchildhood
It would sure make life easier if they could figure out how to make an O2 sensor work with wet exhaust and run a closed loop EFI like cars do.
SDFever is offline  
Old 11-23-2015, 11:01 PM
  #103  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SDFever
This is for everyone but I replied to Keith since he's always been a gentleman -

SPECIFICALLY referring to the 496 knock system (not 502's or...). I said it before; if you rely on an 8.1 496 knock system (talking stock) to help you in any way you are crazy. I've pulled live and historical data on a ton of 555 computers and never once have i seen that system give a good knock code. It will in fact allow you to burn your engine to the ground.

More frustrating, you can and will get knock codes sometimes on failed crank attempts. No offense but i hate that box. Just sayin'.

This includes some modified 555's as well.
Would you please explain how and with what specific equipment you are able to observe live and historical knock codes on a PCM555?
Rage is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 08:43 AM
  #104  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Simple -

Merc CDS and/or Diacom

Historical is saved perm in freeze frame and any live faults show as current trouble codes. When you pull the data in freeze frame it shows all vitals at time of inception.

I promise if you have a lean condition using that box the knock system will not save your azz -

Have you still not purchased a scan tool after all this time?


Originally Posted by Rage
Would you please explain how and with what specific equipment you are able to observe live and historical knock codes on a PCM555?

Last edited by SDFever; 11-24-2015 at 08:59 AM.
SDFever is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 09:55 AM
  #105  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The name of this thread should be changed to something a little more positive imo. It's not a bad platform for many owners. It's certainly less-than-desirable perhaps if you started with no engine or accessory drive parts at all.

Not to mention the fact that there are many owners out there with Raylar parts that now have a way to get a better block once theirs finally lets go. You now have 2 really good stroker options and a bore size that will rival anything out there.

Take your 496 to 588 or even 632 if you feel like it and you do save repurchasing a ton of parts and all the problems that come with it.

Last edited by SDFever; 11-24-2015 at 09:58 AM.
SDFever is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 02:21 PM
  #106  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SDFever
Simple -

Merc CDS and/or Diacom

Historical is saved perm in freeze frame and any live faults show as current trouble codes. When you pull the data in freeze frame it shows all vitals at time of inception.

I promise if you have a lean condition using that box the knock system will not save your azz -

Have you still not purchased a scan tool after all this time?
I got the Diacom in 2008 and borrowed one before that. I have used it extensively over the years for both data logging and reading trouble fault codes. Early on I looked for a knock/detonation fault code generation capability from the PCM555 and found none. Attached is a Mercuiser 496 Fault Code listing. The only codes I see on knock is the Codes #10 & #11 which I suspect is to report a sensor integrity defect.

As an alternative I watched the data logged PCM555 spark timing for any ECU initiated retard that would indicate that a knock event had occurred. I believed then that if no retard had occurred there had been no knock sufficient to exceed the ECU's trigger threshold. Then Dustin Whipple told be that the PCM555 data logged spark timing was only the base timing from the spark table and the ECU's retard of individual cylinders is not recorded.

So I am very interested in how you read a PCM555 fault code reporting a knock/detonation event.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Mercruiser 496 Fault Codes.pdf (42.9 KB, 549 views)

Last edited by Rage; 11-24-2015 at 02:29 PM.
Rage is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 03:34 PM
  #107  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spicewood, Texas USA
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Let me clarify. My comment about 13.5 was referencing light loads. I never tune a naturally aspirated engine leaner than 12.5 at WOT.

Bob

Originally Posted by SDFever
Sorry, that's not my 600 on larry's report. And with all due respect, anyone using any fuel below 91 in a modified boat engine is just asking for it. Why even have the debate? Yes, i'm on record for using 89 several years ago and i did not have any big problems. But i was closer to the ragged edge than i ever realized. And my usage contributed to the survival duration at that time. Regarding the fat side of lean,,,, we could spit this hair all day and get different opinions. My advice going into the tunning process is to have a lot of experience or pay someone who has it. Maybe you are restricted to 87 and i could have forgotten this but i say again - find a way to get the best fuel you can obtain.

The flu shot just gives you small doses of flu... but why go there if you don't have a reason to fear it to begin with? Bob says 13.5. If he has a way or method to mostly guarantee that it's ok on something that he clearly has worked on and setup then I have no opinion. But you can NOT use his or anyone else's number purely on it's own. There are a ton of variables. Far too many.. But yes, my experience with this engine and including the gen 7 is to stay in mid 12's. Bob will probably agree with me that there is no real horsepower gain by trying to be at the top. Fuel makes power. Gotta remember that. AND it cools the top of the piston. If you are racing then it's a whole different story. If you are a rec boater and hate to be towed in, just turn it down.
bobl is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 04:48 PM
  #108  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's what I'm yacking about.. There is none. The sensors are there and they are hooked up but it will let your engine burn to the ground. The knock codes I have seen (as stated earlier) were only at failed cranking speeds along with cam, crank etc.


Originally Posted by Rage
I got the Diacom in 2008 and borrowed one before that. I have used it extensively over the years for both data logging and reading trouble fault codes. Early on I looked for a knock/detonation fault code generation capability from the PCM555 and found none. Attached is a Mercuiser 496 Fault Code listing. The only codes I see on knock is the Codes #10 & #11 which I suspect is to report a sensor integrity defect.

As an alternative I watched the data logged PCM555 spark timing for any ECU initiated retard that would indicate that a knock event had occurred. I believed then that if no retard had occurred there had been no knock sufficient to exceed the ECU's trigger threshold. Then Dustin Whipple told be that the PCM555 data logged spark timing was only the base timing from the spark table and the ECU's retard of individual cylinders is not recorded.

So I am very interested in how you read a PCM555 fault code reporting a knock/detonation event.
SDFever is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 07:20 PM
  #109  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bobl
Let me clarify. My comment about 13.5 was referencing light loads. I never tune a naturally aspirated engine leaner than 12.5 at WOT.

Bob
The 13.5 AFR was in answer to my initial question and the reason for my starting this thread. ie Question. What is the leanest naturally aspirated engine AFR that is safe from detonation damage from idle to 2200 rpm? Plane out is ~2200 RPM. I also noted in the initial post that my significant MAP/engine load increase begins at ~4000 rpm.
Rage is offline  
Old 11-24-2015, 07:33 PM
  #110  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SDFever
That's what I'm yacking about.. There is none. The sensors are there and they are hooked up but it will let your engine burn to the ground. The knock codes I have seen (as stated earlier) were only at failed cranking speeds along with cam, crank etc.
OK. That clears that up. Thanks.
Rage is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.