|
Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
(Post 4395858)
I find these threads amusing. Joe spends his free time HELPING others on this site. You guys think JOE doesn't already know MORE about this topic then what's been posted here before the thread started....LOL
This site is mainly used by BUDGET members. If not we all would have million dollar offshore boats. We all can agree that with money no object aluminum would be our first choice. So would a brand new Mystic, Skater or MTI. Screw buying these used boats, they are junk! I really don't understand how this topic is being ARGUED in such a negative way???? With no hard FACTS to prove that an engine properly designed around iron heads will be JUNK compared to its aluminum brother, just marketing brainwashing. Come on guys (aluminum head koolaid drinker pretend Rich ballers who can afford the best of the best on every single part purchase) try to be a little more positive when participating on here. Do you want more GOOD threads to entertain us and learn or not? I write this with a smile no hard feelings. It's all in good fun! As a side note, I'm currently building a pair of engines, and have gone with Dart 308 iron eagles. The biggest reasons I went iron are 1: Corrosion and 2: Cost. Had I gone with aluminum, the only changes would be a smaller intake runner (not many options with iron) and probably a little more static compression. |
What did i miss ? Whos throwing stones or arguing ? Sure we are debating each others thoughts, but nothing wrong with that.
The main purpose of my post, was more to see if anyone has any hard data, to back up the theory of aluminum dissipating the heat, and its effect . I certainly have heard this theory for many years, its not a new one. Ive seen it mostly promoted by those selling aluminum heads. I guess at what power level , is this even a concern ? I would love to see an Na 572 or 540 build with the Engine Quest 320 heads, or those 330 cnc oron eagles |
Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
(Post 4395858)
I find these threads amusing. Joe spends his free time HELPING others on this site. You guys think JOE doesn't already know MORE about this topic then what's been posted here before the thread started....LOL
This site is mainly used by BUDGET members. If not we all would have million dollar offshore boats. We all can agree that with money no object aluminum would be our first choice. So would a brand new Mystic, Skater or MTI. Screw buying these used boats, they are junk! I really don't understand how this topic is being ARGUED in such a negative way???? With no hard FACTS to prove that an engine properly designed around iron heads will be JUNK compared to its aluminum brother, just marketing brainwashing. Come on guys (aluminum head koolaid drinker pretend Rich ballers who can afford the best of the best on every single part purchase) try to be a little more positive when participating on here. Do you want more GOOD threads to entertain us and learn or not? I write this with a smile no hard feelings. It's all in good fun! Some differing opinions, but that's what forums are for. Maybe try not to be so sensation to posters who offer opinions contrary to those you hold in high regard. |
Originally Posted by Mr Maine
(Post 4395878)
I thought it was an interesting discussion. I only offered some input based on thermodynamics/heat transfer as I have engineering background there (not a professional by any means).
As a side note, I'm currently building a pair of engines, and have gone with Dart 308 iron eagles. The biggest reasons I went iron are 1: Corrosion and 2: Cost. Had I gone with aluminum, the only changes would be a smaller intake runner (not many options with iron) and probably a little more static compression. I think things like Fourier's Law are very interesting topics when it comes to engines. I'm not an engineer but I do work with engineers for a living. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4395882)
What did i miss ? Whos throwing stones or arguing ? Sure we are debating each others thoughts, but nothing wrong with that.
|
On a side note, I just got done with a mild (450 ish hp) 446 for my Mopar. We used iron HP Mopar castings that are widely considered "old school" and outdated. With a good bit of port and bowl work, meticulous setup and a good valve job, we achieved a good result.
If I believed that the only way to go was to buy some "bolt on" aluminum heads, I'd be a grand lighter and no further ahead. |
Honest question
What is, or is there, a realistic max power level for a properly built Marine engine with Iron heads? Or should it be at what power level is the cost savings not worth it anymore? LOTS of good info on this thread for and against IRON heads! |
Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
(Post 4395889)
Honest question
What is, or is there, a realistic max power level for a properly built Marine engine with Iron heads? Or should it be at what power level is the cost savings not worth it anymore? LOTS of good info on this thread for and against IRON heads! The other issue is most ultimate max performance heads will be aluminum with no iron counter part. And what is the number for say a 632 inch running 112 octane? 2000 horse? |
Originally Posted by offshorexcursion
(Post 4395889)
Honest question
What is, or is there, a realistic max power level for a properly built Marine engine with Iron heads? Or should it be at what power level is the cost savings not worth it anymore? LOTS of good info on this thread for and against IRON heads! |
Originally Posted by Mr Maine
(Post 4395894)
My first thought here (and very simple thinking) is once you reach max cubic inches, max boost for max octane all at max compression for iron heads, you could go a little further with aluminum heads on the boost/compression talking gasoline.
The other issue is most ultimate max performance heads will be aluminum with no iron counter part. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.