9.8 deck 598?
#11
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
Nothing wrong with a 4.375" crank in a short deck. 4.5" is a bit much for a short deck boat motor. It's hard on the Pistons. If you don't mind putting Pistons in the motor every year or every other year got for it. A 598 short deck will make more power than a tall deck.
#14
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Nothing wrong with a 4.375" crank in a short deck. 4.5" is a bit much for a short deck boat motor. It's hard on the Pistons. If you don't mind putting Pistons in the motor every year or every other year got for it. A 598 short deck will make more power than a tall deck.
#15
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Nothing wrong with a 4.375" crank in a short deck. 4.5" is a bit much for a short deck boat motor. It's hard on the Pistons. If you don't mind putting Pistons in the motor every year or every other year got for it. A 598 short deck will make more power than a tall deck.
#16
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
#17
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Some good info guys. Tks! The application would be for NA engines that would only see apprx every other weekend for roughly 3 months out of the year type boating. Mostly pleasure boating with an occasional Busch light taking the helm with the pins down bouncing off the rev limiters. Ha..
Even with engines pulled every other season for routine maintenance/inspection I do believe I will use better judgement and begin gathering parts etc with having 565's in mind rather than 598's.
Even with engines pulled every other season for routine maintenance/inspection I do believe I will use better judgement and begin gathering parts etc with having 565's in mind rather than 598's.
#18
Registered

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
more power,maybe a few horse power like in pro stock but no good for longivity.i once viewed a short deck 598 with the pan off,even with a very short skirted piston the oil rings almost left the bore at bdc and the ring pack was stacked,the owner found out the hard way that it was a mistake.he ended up bying pistons,rods,push rods and a tall deck block so he could go racing.he ran the tall deck engine all season without an issue.just saying.
#19
Registered
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
more power,maybe a few horse power like in pro stock but no good for longivity.i once viewed a short deck 598 with the pan off,even with a very short skirted piston the oil rings almost left the bore at bdc and the ring pack was stacked,the owner found out the hard way that it was a mistake.he ended up bying pistons,rods,push rods and a tall deck block so he could go racing.he ran the tall deck engine all season without an issue.just saying.


