548 compression ratio ?
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
548 compression ratio ?
Hi guys, looking to finally do my motor build. If some of you may know I was preparing for a procharger build last winter. Well the charger deal fell through and I really only need 650 hp for my boat. So I'm going to go N/A with a 548.
I have for this year a set of 320 cast iron Pro Topline or RHS heads. Going to run the Scat center C/W crank and h beams and
Mark IV bow tie block.
Question's
Should I run the arp 2000 bolt for this NA set up?
What compression should I top at at I can get 93 most anywhere I boat.
What intake would be ideal
And should I stick to a large 4150 body carb instead of a dominator ?
Thanks Bill
I have for this year a set of 320 cast iron Pro Topline or RHS heads. Going to run the Scat center C/W crank and h beams and
Mark IV bow tie block.
Question's
Should I run the arp 2000 bolt for this NA set up?
What compression should I top at at I can get 93 most anywhere I boat.
What intake would be ideal
And should I stick to a large 4150 body carb instead of a dominator ?
Thanks Bill
#3
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A flat top piston with 120cc heads . .041 thick gaskets will give you 9.25:1 comp ratio. 1050 dominator will get you between 675-700 hp . Of course there is a lot more to consider , cam, intake , rockers, push rods.......
Plan the entire build so all parts work with each other
Plan the entire build so all parts work with each other
#4
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, BB and BillyB for the replies, I have a machine shop / builder telling me that 10-5;1 would be OK and the cam grind cam offset the compression and make it run good on 93,. then if there is an issue to pull some timing out of it. I am questioning that because of a lot of reading i did last year on this site as guys don't seem to go over 10-1 NA in marine apps on 93 octane.
my heads have a 118CC chamber and i will be having cam ground for this application. I want to go no larger than a 660 lift as the heads dont flow much better any higher then this and i want to be easy on Valve springs.
Does anyone have any good duration recommendations for a 548 to make that power from a past build ?
my heads have a 118CC chamber and i will be having cam ground for this application. I want to go no larger than a 660 lift as the heads dont flow much better any higher then this and i want to be easy on Valve springs.
Does anyone have any good duration recommendations for a 548 to make that power from a past build ?
#5
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10.5 is too high in marine world . Yes you can bleed off compression with a late closing intake valve , but why? 540 builds have been done for the last 20 years. There are plenty tried and true combinations. Also no need to over think the cam by planning a "custom grind". Like I said previously, that engine has been built so many times that every cam company will spec you an off the shelf cam.
#6
Gold Member
Gold Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes
on
132 Posts
totally agree, shelf cams are plentiful and leave the guesswork out, if I did mine again I would have used a Crane 651 or 741 cam...
10.5 is too high in marine world . Yes you can bleed off compression with a late closing intake valve , but why? 540 builds have been done for the last 20 years. There are plenty tried and true combinations. Also no need to over think the cam by planning a "custom grind". Like I said previously, that engine has been built so many times that every cam company will spec you an off the shelf cam.
#7
Registered
iTrader: (7)
Thanks, BB and BillyB for the replies, I have a machine shop / builder telling me that 10-5;1 would be OK and the cam grind cam offset the compression and make it run good on 93,. then if there is an issue to pull some timing out of it. I am questioning that because of a lot of reading i did last year on this site as guys don't seem to go over 10-1 NA in marine apps on 93 octane.
my heads have a 118CC chamber and i will be having cam ground for this application. I want to go no larger than a 660 lift as the heads dont flow much better any higher then this and i want to be easy on Valve springs.
Does anyone have any good duration recommendations for a 548 to make that power from a past build ?
my heads have a 118CC chamber and i will be having cam ground for this application. I want to go no larger than a 660 lift as the heads dont flow much better any higher then this and i want to be easy on Valve springs.
Does anyone have any good duration recommendations for a 548 to make that power from a past build ?
#8
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I already have the heads and they are the older Pro Topline cast Iron 320cc Assie heads, before RHS aquired them. All set up and ready to bolt on. Maybe a spring change depending on the cam as i use to run the 731 crane in it.
I found a couple sets of FT pistons between 9-1 and 9;4-1 Manley @9;2-1, CP bullet series @9;3-1 and Diamond's @ 9;1-1 and are the 2618 material pistons.
Then u have the Mahle Power pak at 9;4-1 and SRP 's at 9;5-1 in the 4032 Material which can be run tighter and less noisy,
What would be the better route for the NA marine engine.? i know the 2618 material is better for the blown application but wondering if the 4032 material would work for a NA marine deal..
I found a couple sets of FT pistons between 9-1 and 9;4-1 Manley @9;2-1, CP bullet series @9;3-1 and Diamond's @ 9;1-1 and are the 2618 material pistons.
Then u have the Mahle Power pak at 9;4-1 and SRP 's at 9;5-1 in the 4032 Material which can be run tighter and less noisy,
What would be the better route for the NA marine engine.? i know the 2618 material is better for the blown application but wondering if the 4032 material would work for a NA marine deal..
#10
Registered
iTrader: (3)
I already have the heads and they are the older Pro Topline cast Iron 320cc Assie heads, before RHS aquired them. All set up and ready to bolt on. Maybe a spring change depending on the cam as i use to run the 731 crane in it.
I found a couple sets of FT pistons between 9-1 and 9;4-1 Manley @9;2-1, CP bullet series @9;3-1 and Diamond's @ 9;1-1 and are the 2618 material pistons.
Then u have the Mahle Power pak at 9;4-1 and SRP 's at 9;5-1 in the 4032 Material which can be run tighter and less noisy,
What would be the better route for the NA marine engine.? i know the 2618 material is better for the blown application but wondering if the 4032 material would work for a NA marine deal..
I found a couple sets of FT pistons between 9-1 and 9;4-1 Manley @9;2-1, CP bullet series @9;3-1 and Diamond's @ 9;1-1 and are the 2618 material pistons.
Then u have the Mahle Power pak at 9;4-1 and SRP 's at 9;5-1 in the 4032 Material which can be run tighter and less noisy,
What would be the better route for the NA marine engine.? i know the 2618 material is better for the blown application but wondering if the 4032 material would work for a NA marine deal..
You need to figure out your own compression ratio, based on several things. Actual CC of the heads, not the advertised CC, how far the piston is in the hole, how far the top ring is down, the valve relief/dome/dish volume, headgasket thickness and diameter, and so on.
This is a nice calculator to use.
http://www.diamondracing.net/tools/