Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Russell Check Valve VS. Anti-Siphon Valve >

Russell Check Valve VS. Anti-Siphon Valve

Notices

Russell Check Valve VS. Anti-Siphon Valve

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-01-2016, 03:37 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KCMO
Posts: 428
Received 66 Likes on 38 Posts
Default Russell Check Valve VS. Anti-Siphon Valve

Decided to give my fuel system a look while the tank was exposed and was startled at how restrictive and small the anti-siphon valve was. My pick-up is 3/8" ID and I want to make sure I maintain this full opening through out the system. There seems to be very few choices on bigger anti-siphon valves. I know a lot of you are going to say to punt the anti-siphon valve, but in my case I think it's best to have something as the tank sits above the bilge (cat hull). Imco has a bigger one, but its a 90 degree unit that was going to be hard to adapt. I bought an 8 AN Russell check valve that's rated 3 psi to open which seems to be in anti-siphon valve territory. I am going to use this unless I'm missing something obvious...anyone say don't do it?
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/rus-650613
liquidlounge is offline  
Old 08-01-2016, 08:31 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Mentor, Ohio
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not a pro... But looks like it should work.
monster12valve is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 08:22 AM
  #3  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 2,639
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

It honestly looks like a great replacement compared to the restrictive stock valves. If you ever have any issues it looks easily to bypass with a couple fittings.
JRider is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 08:28 AM
  #4  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,116 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

I'd look into that more as, when speaking in pressure differential, 3psi = 6.11 in HG (inches of vacuum)

That valve is designed to be used after a pump to hold fuel between pump and carb or fuel inectors.

Not so sure it would be good as an antisiphon vale....6" vacuum of draw on it from fuel pump is a lot to open it.

========

Last edited by SB; 08-02-2016 at 09:43 AM. Reason: to be more clear
SB is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 08:36 AM
  #5  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,116 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

Just found this from a Mercruiser bulletin

Mercury MerCruiser’s specification for the maximum vacuum measured at the fuel
inlet of any MerCruiser engine is:
2 in. Hg (7 kPa) maximum at idle rpm, 3000, full throttle and back at idle rpm.
SB is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 02:35 PM
  #6  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KCMO
Posts: 428
Received 66 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Wow! I would have thought the anti-siphon valve would have been stiffer. I guess I won't use the Russell c/v at the tank and no real need for it after the fuel pump if the anti siphon valve is employed.
liquidlounge is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 02:56 PM
  #7  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,546
Received 3,116 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

Do your homework, very possible I screwed up the math. We have two forces going on - one on one side of the valve and another on the other side.
SB is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 02:58 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KCMO
Posts: 428
Received 66 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

OK, I just found a straght 1/2" NPT x 1/2" hose barb anti-siphon valve. It's made by EVM, part#A/S L-180-B-1/2. The only other one this big I found was made by Imco, but it was a crazy 90 degree thing. I'm going to put a 1/2" npt female X 1/2" barb and just use inline on top of the tank. I realize this thread could be flagged as boring.

Last edited by liquidlounge; 08-02-2016 at 02:58 PM. Reason: spelling
liquidlounge is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 04:31 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 935
Received 190 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

I always just knocked the ball and spring out with a punch.
tmmii is offline  
Old 08-02-2016, 04:45 PM
  #10  
BUP
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Merc does not want any more than 2 in / hg pulling a vac test for fuel flow on any engine period. With that said regardless what the spec sheets show for any valve you install inline (fuel side ) you will have to check by vacuum testing to make sure its not over Merc specs.

Many boats use this as well (link below) instead of the anti siphon valve / assembly / (ball - spring) - Sea Ray has used this for many years on alot of their apps.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/PARKER-HANNI...-/252387448995

Last edited by BUP; 08-02-2016 at 04:49 PM.
BUP is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.