Offshoreonly.com

Offshoreonly.com (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/)
-   General Q & A (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q-20/)
-   -   AFR 325 flow sheets.... anyone ever flow these heads? (https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/general-q/340844-afr-325-flow-sheets-anyone-ever-flow-these-heads.html)

getrdunn 01-30-2017 04:10 PM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4524312)
I gotta be honest, after the constant bashing of myself, and the person helping me with people continuing to tell me I'm going to fail, I am not into sharing the details, why? So I can be told my heads suck? My port work sucks? My cams are wrong? My new lifters suck? Why didn't I do this or that? I'm over it... I am making the best of the situation I have.... that's not good for guys here...I keep getting beat up about it

I just wanna know how much slower you go? Lol.

Baja Rooster 01-30-2017 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 4524337)
This is where I beg to differ. wtf. First off not to many NA 900 hp boat engines out cruising around. So let's do a more realistic comparison. 700 NA vs 700 SC. Same driving characteristics. No way. Notta. I know this cause my partner had SC and myself NA twin app same hulls and he'd stop at every port possible to fuel up. More efficient??? Research how much hp it takes to get 900 hp SC.

Didn't matter how we ran either. Regardless I don't pay attention to fuel and doubt it will bankrupt me only having a 2 1/2 month season so either way I could care less. I run hard and when I need fuel I get it.

It takes more fuel on the sc setup just to compensate for the extra drag of the blower, I would think. But wind drag is a far bigger issue. Same hulls, but who had the passengers with the biggest...dock bumpers...hanging in the wind? I've seen drivers throttle hard to dislodge them from their carriers.

phragle 01-30-2017 04:26 PM

Collectively, we are all nothing but a bunch if viscous power hungry b!tches.........

Baja Rooster 01-30-2017 04:46 PM


Originally Posted by phragle (Post 4524346)
Collectively, we are all nothing but a bunch if viscous power hungry b!tches.........

The only thing that keeps us in check at all are our crappy drives, right? Lol

getrdunn 01-30-2017 04:51 PM

It's just all about what you want in then end. There's pros and cons with both. No need to cover the obvious all over again. Like I said I've had and built both and will do again. I could careless what any individual does in regards to their build as long as it's what they want and their happy on the water. SC, NA... whatever.

getrdunn 01-30-2017 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by Baja Rooster (Post 4524352)
The only thing that keeps us in check at all are our crappy drives, right? Lol

you got that right.

Full Force 01-30-2017 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by getrdunn (Post 4524339)
I just wanna know how much slower you go? Lol.

Exactly why I am done, everyone wants to see a failure happen.

SB 01-30-2017 05:04 PM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4524359)
Exactly why I am done, everyone wants to see a failure happen.

I'll take that bet for the 3rd time.

And no, none of us wanted to see any failure. Enough is enough.

chancer540 01-30-2017 05:16 PM


Originally Posted by Full Force (Post 4524359)
Exactly why I am done, everyone wants to see a failure happen.

Again you prove it time and time again, Yo skin is thin as f***!!!!!

I bet when you post your results, with more mph everybody gives you "congrats." well deserved.

14 apache 01-30-2017 05:27 PM


Originally Posted by adk61 (Post 4524301)
One thing I can tell you is.. 900HP supercharged VS 900HP NA the NA version will bankrupt you in fuel costs!! as a blower motor is far more efficient in cruise mode than any NA engine could dream of being...

That is not true.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.