Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Help picking out a cam... >

Help picking out a cam...

Notices

Help picking out a cam...

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2018, 08:33 PM
  #41  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

You might want to find a spring that fits your locaters and retainers, if they make one.
GPM is offline  
Old 03-11-2018, 09:05 PM
  #42  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Curious what the specs are on the 2 different cams
GPM is offline  
Old 03-11-2018, 09:46 PM
  #43  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 143 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Crane 168731
Lift: .587''/.610''
Duration: 288°/298°

The current ZZ502 cam has.527 intake / .544 exhaust
Camshaft Duration (@.050 in.): 224° intake / 234° exhaust
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 02:26 PM
  #44  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

This one HR-226/345-2S-12 IGOperating Range:2500-6000 RPMDuration Advertised:288° Intake / 298° ExhaustDuration @ .050'' Lift:226° Intake / 236° ExhaustValve Lift w/1.7 Rockers:.587'' Intake / .610'' Exhaust
I could be wrong but it doesn't look like it's worth changing.

Last edited by GPM; 03-12-2018 at 02:47 PM.
GPM is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 03:11 PM
  #45  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 143 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
This one HR-226/345-2S-12 IGOperating Range:2500-6000 RPMDuration Advertised:288° Intake / 298° ExhaustDuration @ .050'' Lift:226° Intake / 236° ExhaustValve Lift w/1.7 Rockers:.587'' Intake / .610'' Exhaust
I could be wrong but it doesn't look like it's worth changing.
The springs? That would be nice. I just had the heads gone through about 20 hours ago.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 04:18 PM
  #46  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Just my opinion, the cam is only 2 degrees bigger so I doubt you'll be able to tell. Going from 110 to 112 lsa might idle slightly better, loose a little midrange and maybe pull another 100 rpm. The valves may hit the pistons with the higher lift.
GPM is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 07:07 PM
  #47  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
mcollinstn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: tn
Posts: 5,753
Received 139 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ezstriper
can't help much on cam, but I ran a HP500 with a procharger for years, several carbs and EFI, last setup had to go down to a 750 from a 850 to keep from leaning out at WOT, thanks god for widebands. the air was being blown thru so quickly that would not pull fuel, the 750 worked perfectly
Your boosters weren't getting enough signal. Swapping to stepped boosters and playing with the bleeds should have fixed up the 850. That, and maybe a little drill bit work on the secondary metering plates..

MC
mcollinstn is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 07:17 PM
  #48  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
mcollinstn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: tn
Posts: 5,753
Received 139 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Yeah, you are tapdancing around essentially the same cams for the most part. Sure a little more lobe separation will help a touch, but if you don't have reversion problems I wouldn't bother changing them out. The procharger will definitely wake up the motor, but you definitely want to use a low pitch prop when pulling tubes to take the load off of your outdrive. Running a high pitched prop, and a supercharger while pulling tubes puts a lot more actual torque load on the drive components. Drop 6" of pitch, and you reduce the load on the components dramatically.
I blew up more Bravos than I care to think about. Old style, upgraded to newer cone clutches, billet caps and upgraded parts and pieces - each step made them a little stronger, but you simply won't find me recommending anything over 550hp with a Bravo. XR's are grenades as well. A lightweight boat, under 5600 rpm, cryo gears, billet cap, shower, maybe 650 hp for short bursts if you baby it elsewhere.

You guys who run 800hp on a Bravo, I gotta hand it to you.
You must be more Irish than I am (and I am Michael Collins by the way, with a stout dose of Irish bloodline...).

MC
mcollinstn is offline  
Old 03-12-2018, 09:37 PM
  #49  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 143 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
Just my opinion, the cam is only 2 degrees bigger so I doubt you'll be able to tell. Going from 110 to 112 lsa might idle slightly better, loose a little midrange and maybe pull another 100 rpm. The valves may hit the pistons with the higher lift.
I picked up the cam on a really good deal, and I am hedging against reversion issues as that cam is notorious for destroying marine engines with wet exhaust. I’ll degree the cam in and check PV clearance.


MC,
I’ve already canned the idea of any blowers as I’d rather boat than wrench. I should be well under 550hp and already use a smaller prop for whipping poor unsuspecting friends onto the beach .
Baja Rooster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.